|
Post by socrates on Oct 6, 2006 9:07:13 GMT -5
ChickenLittle mentioned yesterday in the aerosol reports, "Hey also apparently ipod icards has a happy face chemcloud pic.my husband sent it to me today.pretty weird ass shit,like my husband says it is just subliminal conditioning,I was surprised that Apple would have that though." I too have noticed this crap. Check out the recent cover of the NewYorker and one will see planes laying down trails of exotic colours. On ESPN and Comcast, there appears to be persistent subliminal chemtrail muck. I also see the same type of crap looking background on the cable news shows, in the background. More and more ads seem to have them. Lately I have been hitting the keyboards a lot trying to figure out chemtrails. I'm sure I will not be able to keep up this pace forever. Through my searches I came across a website called orbwars which outed Chemtrail Central for censorship of the subliminal nature of the marketing of pollution. There was a thread started February 18, 2003 at CTC called "Chemtrail Media Subliminals". Evidently, CTC has left page two of the thread but has removed the first page where the topic is really developed. This shows that "they" are really having difficulty transitioning from covert spraying to just doing whatever they want with no repercussions. Fortunately, this website orbwar.com has mirrored the missing page one. Here it is. excerpt: posted by Delicious, "What am I trying to point out? SUBLIMINALS you fool! To fill every sky with techno-clouds without it being consciously noticed requires a lot of subliminal influence from corp advertisers." Page 2 which degenerated into typical noise was not deleted. Page one which asks us to critically decode what we see in the mass media is gone.
|
|
|
Post by chickenlittle on Oct 6, 2006 9:43:09 GMT -5
They do know that that IS computer imaged right? Not to lessen the fact that YES they are subliminally screwing with our minds,a little more here and there and pretty soon it will be business as usual. I was just asking because some of those writing on there speak as if they think the jets laid this for a commercial.Also because people are pretty dumb sometimes,I heard 2 women talking about a show on t.v Lost???and they thought it was a reality show,hence just add all crap ingredients together for crap soup. They dont have too,just put it in sheeples minds that What goes great with an ice cold beer??? A BURNING HOT PLANET!!! chcky
|
|
|
Post by altitudelou on Oct 6, 2006 18:55:18 GMT -5
Chemtrail Subliminal's ?
Not to say that there are no Chemtrail Subliminal because there are, they are everywhere you look, it goes far beyond subliminal, it's become obvious that we are being subjected to a total visual, mental saturation bent on conditioning us to accept that these spraying trail's and other effects from them are absolutely normal when that are anything but normal.
The mind control is reaching blatant proportions, most people can see how pervasive the "Chemtrail's" are in TV advertisements that target even children as we see the insidious lines in the sky in cartoons now, three or four years ago there was nothing like them in the background of cartoons, why is there now ?
Video games are full of "Chemtrail's", what age group plays these games the most, young people, their minds and what they think are being altered by what's in the background of those games, you see something over and over without really thinking about it and it becomes "normal", the people responsible for this spraying are truly evil bastards, all that we can do is try to make people aware of this deliberately mind altering operation that is accompanying the Global Spraying of our sky's
|
|
|
Post by chickenlittle on Oct 7, 2006 6:30:57 GMT -5
Yes I agree and that was my point I don't think that some people even know the difference between computer generated and everyday abscrue skies,ya know what I mean? Very sad indeed! chicky
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 7, 2006 11:18:16 GMT -5
I fear that "they" will also doctor videos taken before 1997. However, if "they" do that, one may wonder why debunkers haven't utilized such videos to show that there is nothing new about the skies except for increased air traffic.
|
|
|
Post by altitudelou on Oct 7, 2006 19:01:56 GMT -5
socrates wrote,
"I fear that "they" will also doctor videos taken before 1997. However, if "they" do that, one may wonder why debunkers haven't utilized such videos to show that there is nothing new about the skies except for increased air traffic." _________________________________________________________
If they doctor videos taken before 1997 then they would also have to doctor all movies made prior to 1997 as well, many movies made in the late 90's on, especially those made in Vancouver, British Columbia show a great many Chemtail's in there backgrounds which show scenes with sky in them, prior to the late 90's it's very hard to find the blatant trail's in any movie, that's pretty hard for the debunkers to get around ?
Exactly as you point out, why haven't the debunkers utilized such videos / movies to show that there is nothing new about the skies except for increased air traffic, because they can't, much has been made out of WWII film footage of aircraft leaving normal contrail's and U.S.A.F.film footage of aircraft test flights showing normal contrail's but none of the great mighty mouth debunkers have shown us one movie or video of any event prior to the late 90's in which they can show us contrail's equivalent to the amount of Chemtrail's that we have and are seeing in video and movies since the late 90's to date, now, why is that, you would think they would be falling all over themselves to get such video and movies right in everyone's faces.
I dare any debunker to present a single movie or video made prior to 1996-97 that clearly shows as many normal contrail's in the background as today's movies and videos show Chemtrail's, I'll pretend that I'm from Missouri, the "Show Me" state.
Chickenlittle wrote,
"Yes I agree and that was my point I don't think that some people even know the difference between computer generated and everyday abscrue skies,ya know what I mean?" __________________________________________________
Oh, I sure do, I can't even tell with some of the TV adds if it real or computer generated, so many of the auto adds are just full of trail's, Hmmm, yes, can the debunkers show us some TV car or truck adds prior to 1996-97 that have all of these dammed trail's in them - I don't think so, I never saw the trail crap in adds until the late 90's, how about you all ?
|
|
|
Post by chickenlittle on Oct 18, 2006 6:13:49 GMT -5
No, not that I can remember,the only time I ever saw something that threw me off is an old movie with James Stewart in the lead I will have to think of the name,it was set in old days and there is an odd trail above them in the sky as the camera is kind of doing an under shot of them,and the sky is in view above them for just a short time,it could be that a jet really had just flown over before they did the shot. I do watch these old movies a lot for this very purpose and was surprised to see this. chicky
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 18, 2006 16:39:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by altitudelou on Oct 18, 2006 19:14:16 GMT -5
Hi Chicky,
I like to watch old western's and I always keep an eye open for what's in the background, lot's of the old movies were careless in there filming and got cars, trucks, motorcycles, busses and once in awhile a contrail from a jet in them that got past editing.
Back before we started seeing the Chemtrail's or what's now being called "Persistent Contrail's" in the mid to late 1990's, it was rare to see more than one contrail in the background of a movie or on the evening news, how that changed as of 1996-97 and we not only started seeing targeted areas the sky being filled with the trails but we also started seeing the "Get use to it propaganda" being inserted into just about every visual medium that we are accustom to, no only did we start to see more 'contrail's' in television programming like the local and national news but also in the regular, made for TV movies and most noticeably, TV commercials, today, in just watching TV for a short amount of time we are being subjected to high numbers of commercials that are loaded with the so called normal contrail's in there backgrounds and I believe that is part of an effort to condition people largely through the medium of TV to be accepting of the trails when they see them filling the sky's in real time.
It's like that creepy little guy debunker, what's his name, that lives way down in Arkansas who can sit at his computer and dictate to those of us who live up here in Maine just what our air traffic is that fly's over Parsonsfield in the course of a day because he looks at Flight Explorer, the little creep doesn't live here, doesn't have a clue as to the aircraft that fly over us but because he looks at Flight Explorer he thinks he knows it all and he thinks that by writing about it that he can fool people into believing that we have hundreds of jet's flying over our little town of Parsonsfield here in rural Maine day and night.
There are just over 1500 people living here in Parsonsfield, Maine that would tell the little creepy guy debunker that he's full of crap when he tries to tell people that there are hundreds of jet's flying over us at any given time, that just isn't the case at all, we are fortunate in living here because there is very little in the way of air traffic.
There is a 71 year old retired teacher and school principal who lives just up the road from us and he is familiar with the spraying and the little creepy guy debunker, he calls him an "Educated Idiot" because he acts like he knows everything but he relies almost entirely on "the proper book" when he writes on any subject because he has no common sense, that is very obvious in everything that he writes about and I find our neighbors opinion of the little creepy guy debunker quite common among those that I have discussed these issues with.
The general consensus seems to be that Mr. Creepy is playing mind games with people because we have put so much emphasis on the fact that our normal air traffic is quite light here in Parsonsfield, Maine in spite of the fact that we are close to the main North East Air Traffic Corridor which does carry a tremendous amount of air traffic, the thing that little creepy guy fails to point out in his long winded diatribe asserting that hundreds of aircraft are over us at ant moment of the day or night is that we live 15 to 20 miles outside the main North East Air Traffic Corridor that is to our east, we live in the extreme north east corner of Parsonsfield and about the only air traffic we see normally, on a busy Sunday afternoon or Monday is a couple of west bound flights out of the Portland Jetport 35 miles to our south east or maybe an occasional in bound flight coming from the south or south west.
Little creepy debunker guy says that we see lots of aircraft circling over Parsonsfield ( in holding patterns ) waiting clearance to land at the Portland Jetport, he has no clue that there is not enough air traffic at the Portland Jetport to warrant other aircraft being put in a holding pattern normally, once in awhile due to bad weather, snow, ice, etc, they will put aircraft in holding patterns but those holding patterns seldom extent more than ten or twelve miles in radius from the airport according to those in Air Traffic Control at the Portland Jetport that I have personally talked to, we are 35+ miles north east of the airport, way outside any normal holding pattern that would be used by Air Traffic Control at the Portland International Jetport.
If your interested, the Little creepy guy's crap on air traffic over Parsonsfield, ME. even though he lives in Arkansas,_ "NOT MAINE", can be seen at,....http://goodsky.homestead.com/files/brendt2.html
The point here is I believe, not my own personal encounters with the little creepy guy debunker but one of whether it's propaganda being pumped into our brains via television or the little creepy guy debunker, it's propaganda, period, and that's all there is to it, I think most people who recognize it for what it is also realize that there is a mind set that drives these people unlike that of you and I and those who see the spraying for what it is and not what we are told that it is, i.e. NORMAL, there is certainly nothing normal about it whatsoever, at least not since prior to the1990's.
I tend to believe that their not so subliminal antics of mind conditioning us to accept the spraying as "just normal contrail's" is a large mistake on their part as most people will not buy into their mind tricks, I don't think America is that sound asleep, people have had enough of the Con job with the Bush cabal and the Republicans, people are pissed off and paying attention for a change, we can only hope that they pay attention to the spraying as well, if anything I think that the TV commercials with all of the trails in them are making people curious as to why all of those trails are in them, some people will just be numb to what's really going on with regard to the spraying but anyone who is half way awake is going to question what it is that they are seeing, so, there is hope that many more people will be awakened to the evil that is going on in our sky's.
Socrates,
I like the pic from "Owning The Weather / Weather as a Force Multiplier-2025", Na, there's nothing going on, just normal air traffic. _LOL !!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by altitudelou on Oct 18, 2006 19:29:13 GMT -5
Socrates,
Sorry,
I thought that pic was from "Owning The Weather / Weather as a Force Multiplier-2025", it looked like one of the illustrations in that paper, Oop's, I was mistaken.
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 18, 2006 21:17:22 GMT -5
Socrates, Sorry, I thought that pic was from "Owning The Weather / Weather as a Force Multiplier-2025", it looked like one of the illustrations in that paper, Oop's, I was mistaken. Ugh, sorry Lou, I messed up. I should have figured out the source before posting. Maybe someone remembers, or I'll try to figure it out. It must be driving that debunker nuts being on the wrong side of history, reading the words here, but having no power to respond. Shill or troll, he still adds up to being a pitiful meanie. Why does he have to be so mean about it? I can't believe that is going to make his "hoax" hoax any more believable. He doesn't make any sense. Hopefully not too many folks are relying on dumbass chemtrail forums for their information. Again, I think they have taken this as far as they can. They need it legal so they can blitz the sky much more than they are already doing. Just a hunch. Bring on the Beatles. Hey, where's Ringo?
|
|
|
Post by altitudelou on Oct 18, 2006 23:38:04 GMT -5
Socrates,
I remember seeing that geo-engineering picture posted someplace, it could have been a NOAA site, I'm not sure now but it's very familiar to me, I know I've run across it a couple of times in the past, that's why I likened it to the illustrations in "Owning The Weather / Weather as a Force Multiplier-2025", anyway, it's no big deal, we have looked at how many picture now with regard to this spraying, weather modification, geo-engineering, etc, etc,....how hard is it to get confused about one picture..? ______________________________
'It must be driving that debunker nuts being on the wrong side of history, reading the words here, but having no power to respond. Shill or troll, he still adds up to being a pitiful meanie." ______________________________________
Yeah, I've run out of adjectives to describe the little creepy debunker guy, that's why I'm staying away from that deep dark whole called DBS that he calls home, he's locked in over there, poor baby, I feel real bad about that,....... NOT !
At least he isn't prowling the chem sites like he use to, causing havoc , wasting everyone's time with his endless line of bullshit, the last time that I clicked on DBS he was still giving Halva crap, I swear, those two should get a room and just get it over with, they have a real thing going, well, there welcome to DBS, that's a good place for them, out of sight _ out of mind, that's a good thing.
Later my friend !
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 19, 2006 11:09:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by altitudelou on Oct 20, 2006 18:12:16 GMT -5
Socrates wrote,
"Dominique, a new poster at CTC, just posted blatant chemtrail subliminal found in a kid video." ____________________________________________
Yeah, pretty dammed sick isn't it, how they are filling young minds with this bogus crap, so obvious too, a three year old can point this kind of subliminal trash out_Not so subliminal, is it ?
The French Chemtrail's (link) are no different than the ones we see here in the U.S., I guess you could say that they have "French Fried Sky's" there, whatever they have, it's not normal contrail's, that's for sure.
|
|
|
Post by chickenlittle on Oct 21, 2006 7:17:06 GMT -5
Wow,yes it is a bummer I am just reading all this and thinking how glad I am that I homeschool my kids and my 10 yr. old definately knows a fake cloud when she sees one.What is really sad is that she doesn't really get much of a chance to see the real beautiful puffy ones. Have you guys ever done this: I sit sometimes and like watch the news etc. and pretend that I am clueless,like I drive around and look at the sky like oh well la -de -da and then after about 10 minutes of that crap I am just baffled by HOW THE HELL ARE PEOPLE SOOOOOO BLINDED!!!! ?And then to thinjk that there are IDIOTS out there trying to defend this assault on our world,they must be extremely wacked!!! chicky take care
|
|
|
Post by altitudelou on Oct 21, 2006 19:07:34 GMT -5
Chicky,
I have asked myself the same questions that you have regarding how people can just turn two blind eye's to what's going on in the sky with the spraying, it seems like a good percentage are so apathetic they just don't care what's going on and some are just ignorant and want to remain that way, you know, the red. white and blue, Budweiser brain trust types that think Bush is doing a great job, Saddam Hussein really did have weapons of mass destruction and DENIAL is a river in Egypt, there is no hope that those people will ever really see what's going on in my opinion and it would be pointless trying to educate them on the subject, I think that teaching your pet rock to speak would net better results.
Also, I think that there are a number of people that see the spraying and have looked into it but they are fence sitters about it because of the conspiracy controversy that surrounds the issue, I have run into people, one just recently, that believes that the government is up to something with the spraying but have kept their beliefs to themselves for some time fearing that they would be made fun and ridiculed for taking a strong position on the pro side of the spraying.
One thing I have really noticed over the past several years of speaking with other people about the subject is that people who have ridged political views and are conservatives / Republicans really do not like to talk about the spraying, even when it's pointed out to them, they pass it off lightly as, just contrail's or they think your nut's to think that our government would or could spray something into the atmosphere that might be causing harm to people worldwide, they don't want to admit that possibility at all, it would shatter their nice little politically correct paradigms that their tight right asses are so rapped up in.
I have no doubt whatsoever that it is exactly some of these RIGHT thinking politically correct types that are directly responsible for the spraying that we are seeing taking place and it's accompanying assault on our minds to condition us subliminally to be accepting of their not so secret spraying projects.
It's like Bush and his Con men and women telling everyone over and over a million times, day and night, day in, day out, that Iraq has WMD, a NUCLEAR program, DRONES that could reach the east coast of the U.S., and there were Al-Qaeda TERRORIST in Iraq. Now, we know that none of that was remotely true, it was all a made up bunch of 'Bushit' to alter our perception of what Saddam Hussein and Iraq really was at the time so Bush could justify his invasion of that country, it was all a mind game that they worked on us and the world to get their way and it's not much different than what we are seeing with regard to the spraying and the subsequent mental conditioning accompanying it today through our TV's._ More lies to justify their dark agenda.
Then there are the people like us, the ones who give a damm and care and refuse to shut up like good little obedient peon's to the king _ SCREW THE KING !
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 21, 2006 21:38:54 GMT -5
I just caught the last minute of The Breakfast Club. Judd Nelson is on the school field, you can see the skies. It is overcast, then I swear what look like chemtrails suddenly emerge out of nowhere blended into the overcast skies. Then that scene stays frozen for the minutes it takes to run the credits. The message is these plane lines and clouds are normal. Nothing to see here, just move along..... I think whenever people talk about the subliminals, it is true. They want to gradually build this up, condition us. They are desperate to legalise. They are in over their heads. They can't go any farther without legalisation. They need subliminals to fend us off. Any more spraying even the clueless will think wtf that don't look right. Canadian Rockies-Sulphur Ridge Summit Jasper National Park A volcano venting out sulfur. Looks like a chemtrail sky to me. MT. St. Helens:
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Nov 5, 2006 23:28:10 GMT -5
I just found a blog on the chemtrail subliminals. Gotta love search engines, though they do seem to be rigged. Kind of like you said Lou, how if we only knew how to phrase or know where to look, we could bust this thing wide open. Chemtrail Subliminals"This article says chemtrails showing up all over TV just in the last days or so...I tend to agree with this as certain explanatory reports have become public all of a sudden as if the govt is trying to hide it hard, but I do not do tv, so keep an eye out...lady says they are putting them in ALL the pix all of a sudden...they are freaking out...this was never supposed to come out...supposed to stay hidden so they could effect our behaviour all unbeknownst to us...they never did issue the chemtrail stamps either, did they?...below the link here is a letter I just wrote today to a friend with my concerns about govt propagana" I think there actually are some chemtrail stamps out there. OK, I found another blog where there is a link to the stamps. Undesignated BlogThis blogger says he saw subliminals in two animated pictures, "Cars" and "Over the Hedge". You can see the "chemstamps" here.
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Nov 5, 2006 23:32:28 GMT -5
(Fair Use) The Power Hour Thanks to Rich in Boston for sending! (not me-Socrates- coincidence with Boston) Answer to the Blue and Orange images"See if you come to the conclusion that there are being put forth by the media extensive conditioning tactics. Chemtrail subliminals have now become much more pervasive and are being displayed on the news, especially CBS, NBC, FOX and PBS; on many news programs, sporting events, daytime and evening shows. Focus on the foreground and background images of the show you are watching, whether it is the news, a documentary, or game show. Take notice of the white streaks and smeary cloudlike formations in blue and dark orange backgrounds. If you pay attention to them, these intense subliminal messages will become so clear they will become distracting. Many other TV shows are guilty of these conditioning tactics, such as Dateline, 20/20, Good Morning America, The Today Show, Chronicle, Extra, Nightline, ET, Dr. Phil, The View, Jeopardy, Wheel of Fortune, Family Feud, $10,000 Pyramid Observe the game show “Jeopardy” and you will see the white streaks and smeary cloudlike formations in the blue squares behind the contestants, and they’re so distracting it’s difficult to concentrate on the show. Wheel of Fortune uses some imagination and portrays the white streaks as moving around in a kind of spotlight fashion. If this Geoengineering was temporary there would be no need for the extensive conditioning tactics we are witnessing through the media. The dark orange and milky blue backgrounds are designed to resemble the significant "ground haze" that can be seen from horizon to horizon with clear blue sky overhead. During the early morning and late afternoon, this ground haze appears orange in color. Around midday, on partially clear days, the ground haze appears gray or yellowish. So, what's the answer to all this? If the Aerosol Program is solely for our benefit, with no other recourse, then I would think that informing the public would be the most productive path to take. What would be the benefit to keeping the public at large in the dark? The only plausible reason for keeping us from the Truth of this issue is if there are nefarious purposes behind this massive program. A working journalist for more than 30 years - with writing and photography appearing in more than 50 publications in eight countries – award-winning Canadian reporter William Thomas says he is exasperated and embarrassed by his profession. “Newspaper editors and TV news directors have been telling me to bring them proof of chemtrails. The more evidence I present, the more they back away from this story. It was the same with Gulf War Illness and all of the unasked questions surrounding 9.11. In challenging news people to cover the news, Thomas charges that simply repeating official denials while ignoring a deluge of reports from experts and eye-witnesses across North America is not good enough. “This is not journalism,” he says. “This is propaganda.” "
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Nov 6, 2006 0:42:56 GMT -5
ClearChannel BillboardSaks 5th Avenue Using Chemtrails In Its AdvertisingI'm finding it a chore to find photos. It's as if one must go to Rense or some other nutty places to find things. I think they just want the masses to think the white outs are natural, that the chemtrails are contrails. Here's an image the BBC uses at their website. Here is an image for an ad used by an Attorney out of Texas (texasdruglawyer.net) Here is a chem whiteout from www.geocities.com/canadianchemtrailsThis last one is a time progression. We know what they look like. I think that someday more people will believe in chemtrails than in 9/11 as an inside job, unless they put a halt to it NOW! Albuquerque, July 1999
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Nov 23, 2006 15:59:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Nov 24, 2006 14:51:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Nov 25, 2006 13:47:56 GMT -5
I think "they" are trying to condition the sheeple to think blue naturally turns into white. Check out this next one, how on one horizon there is blue skies, yet on the other it is milky-white. Is that in the direction of the sun? And finally, here's one from this very site we are visiting:
|
|
|
Post by lophofo on Nov 25, 2006 21:03:22 GMT -5
socrates,
Those are great subliminal pics. I expecially like the ones you posted for Tiger Woods. That's interesting that even artists are programming that into video games these days.. Did any of you guys catch the Artist of the Month in October for XBox Live? It was Augustana. Any way, their music video for Boston was available for download for free. If any of you have seen it, I'm sure you noticed the chemtrails in certain parts, since it was filmed entirely outside right by the ocean, probably Pacific.
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Nov 26, 2006 18:07:13 GMT -5
Thanks Lophofo. I found a better one for the Tiger Woods golf, but it wasn't showing up, so I deleted it. Saks 5th Avenue Using Chemtrails In Its Advertising4-2-01 "I have noticed chemtrails in the background of numerous advertisements, television shows and media stories. Most are there because it is difficult to shoot outdoor scenes these days without capturing the ubiquitous lines in the sky. However, in the attached advertising photos, there is a blatant intent to highlight these anomalous images."
|
|
|
Post by lophofo on Nov 27, 2006 20:28:44 GMT -5
socrates, we should call you webcrawler. You always manage to find such useful information on the Internet to back up your points. The colors go well, don't get me wrong. But why anyone would want to use such a blatant picture of chemtrailing in their ads is beyond me. It most definitely appears that we are supposed to think that these are naturally occurring and beautiful. It's probably another ploy to push the pollution towards acceptance.
I just watched "Cars" yesterday for the first time. And when "Lightning McQueen" is stuck in town and is set to race against "Doc" out in the desert, you can see the deliberate chemtrails in the sky. They almost look like a line that has turned into a grid or that tire marks were made in the sky. Now, why in the world would you put that in a children's movie? For programming sake? It's unbelievable. I never realized how much we are being conditioned by this phenomena. No wonder people look up and don't really "see."
|
|
|
Post by altitudelou on Nov 27, 2006 20:42:43 GMT -5
This link to... www.bariumblues.com/blue_cross.htm... poses some thoughts on Chemtrail subliminal and why we are being so heavily saturated with images of them through television programming / people programming if you ask me.
|
|
|
Post by chickenlittle on Nov 27, 2006 21:25:28 GMT -5
This is a bit off the subject but the slow infiltration is shown in this: A school in Texas now uses finger print scan for school lunches for very small children up,I find it very scarey that it is associated with no finger print no food sort of situation. This is truely just the beginning of programming kids to think it is regular business as usual. I am glad I homeschool my kids. chicky
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Nov 27, 2006 21:52:27 GMT -5
Thanks again for the kind words. I just figured out how to download any image I come across. You just hold down the mouse on the image, a menu pops up, and then just open it in a new window, you have the image address. I think they are trying to get us used to white skies. Today was the fourth straight day we got the chemtrail treatment. If they can brainwash us to accept this new "overcast" situation, then they proceed according to this new matrix like structure. I plugged in your movie Cars. Owen Wilson is in that? He's funny. [ON EDIT] Images which were showing up for some unknown reason are no longer working, thus I have deleted them. I hope these will work. Notice the milky white look? Is that a chemtrail up top? And are white outs supposed to be so common and natural? Well, sorry I couldn't find better ones. The ads I've put up recently are everywhere, easy to find, this blue to white imagery. I admit there are better ones out there. Hopefully we can find them and give this thread some extra juice. Hey Lou, your link doesn't seem to be working. I did just find some photos by one of your neighbors from 2002. AUBURN, MAINE CHEMTRAILSMAY, 2002 By: JIM MATHERS "I take a drive in the afternoon and see the large chem mass that is being made." "The sun has a large ring around it due to the chem haze. It is very bright out and one begins to make connections as to this being part of the issue." (me) Still working on the delivery system? "A shadow off to the side of the left chemtrail shows the level of saturation." "One last look. I went home and watched many more jets leave chemtrails over my house. I quit taking more photos as I had at least 60 usable ones. It was useless and impossible to try to document anything more. I drove 45 minutes to Portland and watched the same thing going on there too. I try to guess why this would be done. It seems way beyond testing or manipulation of weather. I sense a desperation and urgency here. I am no expert and your guess is as good as mine, but to put on a show like that in daylight and in such numbers. To take a blue sky and change it before the public when it is easy to see that aircraft emissions are totally responsible. To expend all that energy, cost, logistics. It really seems like they are doing this because they feel there is no choice at this point." Me: Uh oh, last sentence scares me. What? They are needed cause some pilot told Swampy they are real gooooodd? ? www.deepspace4.com/pages/chemtrails/auburn/images/0502/auburn08050227.JPG[/img]It's a bit sad the last days seeing them going about this so blatantly. Maybe if we the people are so stupid not to see what is happening we deserve this. Even Foot Soldier over at DBS is saying the same exact thing. She calls them contrails because she thinks this will get people more likely to see there is a problem. I feel her pain. Normal Contrails: Some Sanityposted by FS: "Boston, MA - Today's high temperature 59 degrees. I listened with interest to local weather commentary this weekend. For starters, three all-time high-temperature records were broken at the Mt. Washington Weather Station in New Hampshire this month. Nov. 12 – 44 degrees, November 16 - 46 degrees and November 17 - 47 degrees; all readings about 20 degrees above normal for the month of November. It was also interesting to hear the commentary on Boston area weather conditions since Saturday, November 25 and the 5-day forecast, which is for “unseasonably high daytime temperatures”, i.e. 58-62 degrees for most of the week. I kept a close eye on the sky yesterday in particular and watched a clear blue A.M. sky transformed by late afternoon into complete overcast exclusively resulting from spreading contrails. I mean I watched this in progress, checking in about every 30-40 minutes on average. It really upsets me to see this happening despite having witnessed it over and over and over for the last seven years now. Today, Monday, we apparently have the desired level of overcast to achieve a condition of “limited sunshine” as the weather anchors have been repeatedly characterizing it in their forecasts for the last 24 hours. (These forecasts are obviously pre-scripted.) I.e. what we have is a translucent shroud of stratus-like overcast through which blue sky and some sunlight can be seen. Perfect. Nice job. It just blows my mind that people still don't see what is going on right in their faces." Hey the Patriots beat Da Bears Foot Soldier. We need to get over our cloud phobias and enjoy the sports hub of America. NOT. This is really getting annoying. But speaking of Da Bears,
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Nov 27, 2006 22:08:14 GMT -5
[on edit] Images that were appearing nicely have now disappeared. hmmm? not m'kay. Let's hope these new ones work. From Over the HedgeNot exactly blue skies anymore: What ever happened to nice normal wispy clouds? Stop whiting out our skies you pigs.
|
|