|
Post by altitudelou on Oct 2, 2006 17:22:13 GMT -5
"relevant" topics here !
|
|
|
Post by halva on Oct 9, 2006 1:28:15 GMT -5
Lou, halva, and Socrates. Please Stop As I said, I don't censor, but this bickering is looking mighty boring. Do you guys want me to set up an invisible fight club? I am anyway, and I'll see if you all want to go there. I'm serious, I think you should all hash this out in private, and we can all go there to express our grievences. This invisible "fight club" could be used not for fighting between ourselves but for discussing what to do about Reynolds and other debunkers of his ilk, without thereby providing them with material they can use for promoting themselves and disorganizing us. "Mom", who claims to have abandoned Debate Both Sides could be invited to participate if she wants to.
|
|
|
Post by altitudelou on Oct 9, 2006 18:01:16 GMT -5
So, you guy's managed to chase 'mom' off over at DBS, I was wondering how long she would last in the shark tank, I did not hold out much hope that she could stand up to Reynolds for very long, as we all know, he is poison.
That said, I really don't care what's going on at your house (DBS) where Reynolds is locked in, that's a great place for him, his very own padded room, we don't have to put up with his bullshit here and we are free to roam, as it should be.
You seem intent on discussing Reynolds and his "Ilk", I can't speak for anyone else here but as for myself, I have given up dealing with the debunkers, period, I won't give them any more of my time, period, they can all piss off, I have better things to do with my time than waste it on puke like that.
I think you right in that we should all just ignore the debunkers, let them rant and rave and throw their little fits, who cares, let them squawk, there audience is diminishing day by day as more and more people become aware of the Global Spraying, there like mice squeaking in the dark.
Doesn't anyone over at DBS want to discuss the problems you perceive with Reynolds, why come here and stir things up ?
I don't get it, I just gave up on the A-Hole debunkers and now you come on with this idea of starting a circle jerk to discuss OUR problems with them, give me a break Wayne, I'll take a pass if you don't mind.
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 9, 2006 19:54:02 GMT -5
posted by halva
"This invisible "fight club" could be used not for fighting between ourselves but for discussing what to do about Reynolds and other debunkers of his ilk, without thereby providing them with material they can use for promoting themselves and disorganizing us."
The fight club is so any of us can confront anyone else with harsh disagreements without tainting the main site. CTC type bickering is a waste of time and swampgas is right, it is boring.
At Megasprayer folks pointed out to you that you make this "He who shalt not be named" character out to be way more influential than he is. He is an idiot.
Why you still think the pitiful lame 1999-2002 debunkers have any standing is beyond my comprehension. People should be focussed in bringing together documents, photographs, and insights into what's going on.
Wow, Mom forgave you for the earlier comments, but then you still found a way to tick her off.
posted by Lou:
"I don't get it, I just gave up on the A-Hole debunkers and now you come on with this idea of starting a circle jerk to discuss OUR problems with them, give me a break Wayne, I'll take a pass if you don't mind."
Those clowns have no merit at all anymore. The big villians are those behind the geo-engineering along with their hacks and shills. They were always who people should have targeted, but there seems to have been an organised psychological operation on the internet to discredit and obfuscate chemtrail truths with both disinformation along with scripted dramatic rabbit holes.
And the subliminals aren't working. They stink. Sometimes it takes longer than usual for the truth to emerge, but it will.
|
|
|
Post by altitudelou on Oct 9, 2006 22:50:52 GMT -5
Socrates,
Amen brother,.....Amen, if it's not to harsh I'd just like to say that if Wayne wants to keep on about the 'almighty debunker' that we all find totally useless, then he should stick with DBS and the Reynolds and Halva show and not try and drag us into his problems, we have quite enough to do in dealing with the real issues of the spraying, etc,...and don't need to be involved with side issues with debunkers, thank you very much.
|
|
|
Post by halva on Oct 9, 2006 23:10:14 GMT -5
OK. I agree with you.
I put my position on the record as an alternative to private e-mail correspondence for anyone who wants to talk about something that I have made clear I DON'T want to talk about. At least not publicly and on-line.
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Oct 10, 2006 18:09:30 GMT -5
You all want the Discussion Lounge invisible?
|
|
|
Post by altitudelou on Oct 10, 2006 18:59:51 GMT -5
Swampgas,
I don't plan on discussing the "DEBUNKER" so I have no need of an invisible Discussion Lounge, Wayne no doubt could use such a "Discussion Lounge" to not discuss what he really does want to discuss but not in public.
Jesus, I'm dizzy, I don't think I could take the round and round of an invisible Discussion Lounge but you guy's feel free.
"Near the day of the Great Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky." ................................................... Hopi prophecy.
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 10, 2006 19:24:22 GMT -5
I'm not sure freedom of speech can survive the need for no conflict. I took a tinfoil debunker to task in the discussion lounge, but the only response I've gottten are attacks on my karma points. If you want me to leave the forum swampgas I will. As you posted a few months back, " Right now, there are some suspicious people joining here, and I guarantee........ One out of bounds debunker sets foot, I will ban them quicker than a New York minute. " Debunkers are no longer the problem. In fact, they have never been the true problem as regards to chemtrails. The real problems at forums are with those who slither their way in as chemtrail believers only to hurt the cause by presenting disinformation and confusion. whitmajicman, boomerchick, weatherman, deep shield, mr. jones, mind control nuts ....
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Oct 10, 2006 19:40:23 GMT -5
I'm not sure freedom of speech can survive the need for no conflict. I took a tinfoil debunker to task in the discussion lounge, but the only response I've gottten are attacks on my karma points. If you want me to leave the forum swampgas I will. As you posted a few months back, " Right now, there are some suspicious people joining here, and I guarantee........ One out of bounds debunker sets foot, I will ban them quicker than a New York minute. " Debunkers are no longer the problem. In fact, they have never been the true problem as regards to chemtrails. The real problems at forums are with those who slither their way in as chemtrail believers only to hurt the cause by presenting disinformation and confusion. whitmajicman, boomerchick, weatherman, deep shield, mr. jones, mind control nuts .... If you are referring to mmmmbarium, I'm not sure he/she is. Of course, MB is causing some problems, but don't we all at times. Halva has caused problems, but I know him long enough to know he is just someone with a strong opinion. I will keep my eyes open and ears to the tracks though. BTW, at least two of the people you mentioned are the same person.
|
|
|
Post by altitudelou on Oct 10, 2006 20:01:37 GMT -5
Sinse I'm not a mod here and I do believe in our first amendment rights (Except for debunkers) I will just take a Switzerland pill and remain neutral on this subject for now but to be sure if I smell a rat I won't hesitate to chime in on the offending body. ___________________________________
"Near the day of the Great Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky." ................................................... Hopi prophecy.
|
|
|
Post by halva on Oct 10, 2006 23:33:09 GMT -5
You all want the Discussion Lounge invisible? If the Discussion Lounge is what was called being the Fight Club, it should be invisible.
|
|