|
Post by chickenlittle on Aug 28, 2009 9:11:32 GMT -5
worse than the article itself are the remarks posted it is sort of like a stupid meter of what people are thinking eh? so like one out of 10 comments was smart enough to know it is for population control. it is my fellow man that is gonna get me screwed for sure, funny it is at an air force base for more reasons than one perhaps it is in spray as well?
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Aug 28, 2009 22:04:02 GMT -5
One guy at my job said maybe we should encourage people to take H1N1 vaccine and wear blue caps. He said that then we could identify the stupid people. He has a wicked sarcastic sense of humor ;D, and he is on board with us on this.
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Aug 30, 2009 9:36:17 GMT -5
www.naturalnews.com/026934_health_public_health_quarantine.htmlWake Up, America: Forced vaccinations, quarantine camps, health care interrogations and mandatory "decontaminations"Friday, August 28, 2009 by: Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor (NaturalNews) The United States of America is devolving into medical fascism and Massachusetts is leading the way with the passage of a new bill, the "Pandemic Response Bill" 2028, reportedly just passed by the MA state Senate and now awaiting approval in the House. This bill suspends virtually all Constitutional rights of Massachusetts citizens and forces anyone "suspected" of being infected to submit to interrogations, "decontaminations" and vaccines. It's also sets fines up to $1,000 per day for anyone who refuses to submit to quarantines, vaccinations, decontamination efforts or to follow any other verbal order by virtually any state-licensed law enforcement or medical personnel. You can read the text yourself here: www.mass.gov/legis/bills/sen... Here's some of the language contained in the bill: (Violation of 4th Amendment: Illegal search and seizure) During either type of declared emergency, a local public health authority... may exercise authority... to require the owner or occupier of premises to permit entry into and investigation of the premises; to close, direct, and compel the evacuation of, or to decontaminate or cause to be decontaminated any building or facility; to destroy any material; to restrict or prohibit assemblages of persons; (Violation of 14th Amendment; illegal arrest without a warrant) ...an officer authorized to serve criminal process may arrest without a warrant any person whom the officer has probable cause to believe has violated an order given to effectuate the purposes of this subsection and shall use reasonable diligence to enforce such order. [Gunpoint] (Government price controls) The attorney general, in consultation with the office of consumer affairs and business regulation, and upon the declaration by the governor that a supply emergency exists, shall take appropriate action to ensure that no person shall sell a product or service that is at a price that unreasonably exceeds the price charged before the emergency. "Involuntary Transportation" (also known as kidnapping) Law enforcement authorities, upon order of the commissioner or his agent or at the request of a local public health authority pursuant to such order, shall assist emergency medical technicians or other appropriate medical personnel in the involuntary transportation of such person to the tuberculosis treatment center. $1,000 / day in fines Any person who knowingly violates an order, as to which noncompliance poses a serious danger to public health as determined by the commissioner or the local public health authority, shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 30 days or a fine of not more than one thousand dollars per day that the violation continues, or both. Forced vaccinations Furthermore, when the commissioner or a local public health authority within its jurisdiction determines that either or both of the following measures are necessary to prevent a serious danger to the public health the commissioner or local public health authority may exercise the following authority: (1) to vaccinate or provide precautionary prophylaxis to individuals as protection against communicable disease... Forced quarantine for those who refuse (illegal imprisonment without charge) An individual who is unable or unwilling to submit to vaccination or treatment shall not be required to submit to such procedures but may be isolated or quarantined pursuant to section 96 of chapter 111 if his or her refusal poses a serious danger to public health or results in uncertainty whether he or she has been exposed to or is infected with a disease or condition that poses a serious danger to public health, as determined by the commissioner, or a local public health authority operating within its jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Aug 30, 2009 21:05:08 GMT -5
www.naturalnews.com/026940_vaccines_vaccination_health.htmlHistorical facts about the dangers (and failures) of vaccinesSaturday, August 29, 2009 by: Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor (NaturalNews) Vaccines are the quackery of modern medicine. Mass vaccination programs not only fail to protect the population from infectious disease, they actually accelerate the spread of disease in many cases. Many website have cropped up over the last few years to counter the pro-vaccine propaganda put out by drug companies (who profit from vaccines) and health regulators (who serve the drug companies). One of those sites is www.VaccinationDebate.com , which lists the following historical facts about vaccines: • In the USA in 1960, two virologists discovered that both polio vaccines were contaminated with the SV 40 virus which causes cancer in animals as well as changes in human cell tissue cultures. Millions of children had been injected with these vaccines. (Med Jnl of Australia 17/3/1973 p555) • In 1871-2, England, with 98% of the population aged between 2 and 50 vaccinated against smallpox, it experienced its worst ever smallpox outbreak with 45,000 deaths. During the same period in Germany, with a vaccination rate of 96%, there were over 125,000 deaths from smallpox. (http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/020...) The Hadwen Documents • In Germany, compulsory mass vaccination against diphtheria commenced in 1940 and by 1945 diphtheria cases were up from 40,000 to 250,000. (Don't Get Stuck, Hannah Allen) • In 1967, Ghana was declared measles free by the World Health Organisation after 96% of its population was vaccinated. In 1972, Ghana experienced one of its worst measles outbreaks with its highest ever mortality rate. (Dr H Albonico, MMR Vaccine Campaign in Switzerland, March 1990) • In 1977, Dr Jonas Salk who developed the first polio vaccine, testified along with other scientists, that mass inoculation against polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA since 1961. (Science 4/4/77 "Abstracts" ) • In the UK between 1970 and 1990, over 200,000 cases of whooping cough occurred in fully vaccinated children. (Community Disease Surveillance Centre, UK) • In the 1970's a tuberculosis vaccine trial in India involving 260,000 people revealed that more cases of TB occurred in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. (The Lancet 12/1/80 p73) • In 1978, a survey of 30 States in the US revealed that more than half of the children who contracted measles had been adequately vaccinated. (The People's Doctor, Dr R Mendelsohn) • The February 1981 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association found that 90% of obstetricians and 66% of pediatricians refused to take the rubella vaccine. • In 1979, Sweden abandoned the whooping cough vaccine due to its ineffectiveness. Out of 5,140 cases in 1978, it was found that 84% had been vaccinated three times! (BMJ 283:696-697, 1981) • In the USA, the cost of a single DPT shot had risen from 11 cents in 1982 to $11.40 in 1987. The manufacturers of the vaccine were putting aside $8 per shot to cover legal costs and damages they were paying out to parents of brain damaged children and children who died after vaccination. (The Vine, Issue 7, January 1994, Nambour, Qld)
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Aug 31, 2009 23:38:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Sept 1, 2009 23:06:38 GMT -5
Antibodies to Squalene in Gulf War Syndrome*1www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WFB-45F4JKG-1X&_user=10&_coverDate=02%2F29%2F2000&_alid=997834838&_rdoc=15&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_cdi=6790&_sort=r&_docanchor=&view=c&_ct=95&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=54ee56b70241f905315474807761e789Pamela B. Asa1, Yan Cao and Robert F. Garry Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Tulane Medical School, 1430 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112 Received 23 September 1999. Available online 25 March 2002. Gulf War Syndrome (GWS) is a multisystemic illness afflicting many Gulf War-era veterans. The molecular pathological basis for GWS has not been established. We sought to determine whether the presence of antibodies to squalene correlates with the presence of signs and symptoms of GWS. Participants in this blinded cohort study were individuals immunized for service in Desert Shield/Desert Storm during 1990–1991. They included 144 Gulf War-era veterans or military employees (58 in the blinded study), 48 blood donors, 40 systemic lupus erythematosus patients, 34 silicone breast implant recipients, and 30 chronic fatigue syndrome patients. Serum antibodies to squalene were measured. In our small cohort, the substantial majority (95%) of overtly ill deployed GWS patients had antibodies to squalene. All (100%) GWS patients immunized for service in Desert Shield/Desert Storm who did not deploy, but had the same signs and symptoms as those who did deploy, had antibodies to squalene. In contrast, none (0%) of the deployed Persian Gulf veterans not showing signs and symptoms of GWS have antibodies to squalene. Neither patients with idiopathic autoimmune disease nor healthy controls had detectable serum antibodies to squalene. The majority of symptomatic GWS patients had serum antibodies to squalene. *1 We thank David L. Smalley, Ph.D. for advice and discussion. R.F.G. has been supported for work on autoimmune diseases by research grants from Autoimmune Technologies of New Orleans, Louisiana, and the NIH. 1 To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed at 6553 Cottingham Place, Memphis, TN 38120. Fax: (901)683-3938. E-mail: PMBA@aol.com.
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Sept 7, 2009 10:17:04 GMT -5
www.theflucase.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=506%3Acdc-states-h1n1-vaccine-may-maim-and-kill-30000-americans&catid=41%3Ahighlighted-news&Itemid=105&lang=enEven the CDC admits that the "swine flu" jab will kill many people in the USA, though its estimate is extremely conservative as might be expected from a body pushing the toxic jab on the people of the USA on the orders of WHO and for the profit of Baxter, Goldman Sachs and other pharma companies and banks. CDC States H1N1 Vaccine May Maim and Kill 30,000 Americans, FDA Requires Minimal Efficacy; CDC says to assume 1 in every 100,000 vaccine recipients will suffer serious side effects, FDA only requires vaccine be effective By Herb Newborg-Global Research-August 28, 2009 www.globalresearch.ca Global Research, August 28, 2009 YourSpine.com The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has officially stated that there will be as many as 30,000 serious, potentially lethal adverse reactions to the novel H1N1 vaccine, while the FDA guidelines for the novel H1N1 vaccine only require that it work in 3 out of every 10 recipients. Last Saturday, I attended one of 10 “public engagement” meetings the CDC is holding across the country, utilizing a new model of public engagement designed to provide a public viewpoint or societal perspective on the topic at hand (mass vaccination) to the sponsor (in this case, the CDC). Part of the process entails the sponsor (CDC) providing the following: “Information on the many sides of an issue is provided to the participants in a fair and balanced manner so that all participants become well-informed, and the overall group process is convened and managed in a neutral, respectful fashion.” This requirement is met by providing an oral presentation in easy to understand language, a booklet summarizing the key facts needed and a discussion guide summarizing the choices faced. The assembled group of 80 participants was shown a video, given a brief oral presentation and a printed discussion guide. We were asked to accept several assumptions in considering the topic. We were asked to assume that the severity would be similar to what had already been observed in the spring of 2009; we were told to assume that the vaccination program would be voluntary, not mandatory; we were told to assume that initial vaccine supplies will be available in October but supply would be limited through February 2010. The most disturbing assumption we were asked to accept dealt with the safety of the novel H1N1 vaccine. In the video, the CDC spokesperson explained that during the 1976 mass vaccination campaign, 1 in every 100,000 recipients of the vaccine developed Guillain Barré syndrome (GBS), a disorder in which the body's immune system attacks the peripheral nervous system often leading to paralysis and death. There is no known cure for GBS. In 1976 roughly 40 million Americans received the vaccine and some 4,000 developed GBS. The printed material that was distributed reiterated these horrific statistics and we were asked to accept the assumption that, “the estimated risk for more serious reactions (e.g. Guillain Barré syndrome) is between 1-10 per million persons vaccinated”. This is a less direct way of stating that the risk is about the same as existed during the 1976 mass vaccination attempt and that as many as 1 in every 100,000 recipients will develop GBS or some other serious adverse reaction. The CDC is setting up a new intensive surveillance system with which to monitor and track GBS cases that result from the novel H1N1 vaccine. Merriam-Webster defines assumption as a fact or statement taken for granted and assumed to be true. If we accept the documented assumption presented by the CDC, we are to consider it a fact that 1 in every 100,000 vaccine recipients will suffer a serious adverse effect such as GBS. This means that if the entire U.S. population is vaccinated (a stated goal of the CDC), we are to assume as a fact that 30,000 Americans will suffer debilitating or lethal side effects. Apparently the CDC considers this an acceptable level of collateral damage. As unthinkable as this is (destroying or ending the lives of as many as 30,000 Americans), that is only part of the story. The novel H1N1 vaccine being developed must adhere to guidelines set forth by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA has announced that a vaccine will be accepted if it creates antibodies in 4 out of 10 recipients (40%), with at least 70 percent of those 4 achieving an antibody level believed to provide benefit. This means that an acceptable vaccine candidate would provide “protection” for 28% of vaccine recipients (70% of the 40%), or less than 3 in 10 recipients. The requirement drops to 18% efficacy for those over 65 years of age (60% of 30%). So here are the facts, as documented by the CDC and the FDA: As many as 30,000 Americans will be harmed by the novel H1N1 vaccine. The vaccine may be ineffective in more than 7 out of 10 recipients. And in case you think I am alone in my concerns, here is what several vaccine experts associated with the CDC and the U.S. government say on the subject. "I am very skeptical of finishing vaccine before we know the appropriate dose to be included in each inoculation, before immunogenicity studies are complete, or before safety assessments have been finished," William Schaffner, MD, Chairman of the Department of Preventive Medicine at Vanderbilt University and a member of the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), wrote in an recent e-mail. "We have assured both the profession and the public that the H1N1 vaccine will be evaluated with the same rigor that is applied to seasonal vaccine. We should NOT make vaccine available before the trials are complete and the results carefully assessed." Others are worried about a repeat of the last swine flu "pandemic," now regarded as a public health and public relations debacle. "I fear that a rush towards vaccinating the population without completing trials risks leading to the harmful outcome that we witnessed during the 1976 swine flu scare, where the government advocated rapid production and vaccination of the population without adequate safeguards, which led to an unexplained increase in cases of Guillain Barré syndrome (GBS), amongst other complications, and massive liability for the government," wrote Amir Afkhami, MD, PhD, of George Washington University, an international expert on the 1918 Influenza pandemic and an advisor to the U.S. State Department, the U.S. military, and the World Bank on issues pertaining to infectious diseases, public health and, mental health. "I think in this regard, we must learn from lessons of the past and be mindful of not jumping from the proverbial frying pan into the fire by putting people's health at risk without adequate production and safety monitoring of the vaccines."
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Sept 7, 2009 10:21:56 GMT -5
Revolution is the answer
An international corporate crime syndicate is about to force on the people of the world an unproven and toxic vaccine to achieve their political, spiritual and economic objectives.
Laws are in place in every country to stamp everyone who refuses to take these toxic jabs as a criminal - and the police are today entitled to use deadly force against criminal suspects.
That means, if I, for example, refuse this jab in Austria in the next few weeks, I will be classified as a criminal.
I have no criminal record. Yet I will have a criminal record for refusing to take this poison from a company, Baxter - being investigated by the police for deliberately putting live bird flu in vaccine material to trigger a pandemic - for refusing to consent to an action that will cause me death or deadly injury.
If you refuse this lethal jab in your country, you will be classified and registered as a criminal, too. The police, too, will be entitled to use physical coercion to force you to take this jab.
But who, here, is the real criminal?
There is overwhelming evidence that the people who are implementing this forced mass vaccinaiton plan are the real criminals.
It is a shame on us, the people, that we have allowed it to come to this point where the future of the entire human race is at stake, where liberty, life and civilization are just weeks away from total annihilation by a programme of forced mass vaccinations.
The mass graves have been prepared, millions of body bags and plastic coffins are standing ready: the concentration camps are waiting to act as quarantine centers.
It is a shame on us that we stand idly by and watch a group of criminals implement a genocidal plan of a scope and scale that has no parallel in our history.
All the evidence that the forced mass vaccinations with a toxic and unproved substance is a genocidal plan by WHO and UN, the pharmaceutical companies and the Rothschild, Rockefeller banking crime syndicate is there.
It is a shame on us, the people, that we have not learned the lessons of history and of the need to confront criminals and tyrants forcefully and courageously in good time.
How can we, people who break absolutely no law, allow ourselves to be stamped as criminals for refusing to go to our deaths by taking these jabs?
How can we meekly accept such a perverse and murderous law issued by decree by our so-called governments without any discussion or debate?
How can we accept that the infrastructure for genocide is being built around us as we go about our daily business – and do nothing?
How can we accept that governments in secrecy implement plans to bypass hospitals and doctors and create secure vaccine centers to administer this poison to others – and do nothing?
We have seen the 19-page document issued by the French Health Minister and Minister of Interior to start the forced mass vaccination in France from September 28th, just three weeks away.
It is a shame on us all, yes, a shame on us, if we stand by just one more day and watch this criminal plan unfold and do nothing to stop it.
The criminals are so arrogant, so hardened in depravity, so without any decency, honor or empathy as they pursue their restless search for ever more power, luxury and money, supporting each other in their abuse of their office in their secret networks, that for us to accept orders from them is a disgrace.
What person of dignity and honesty takes orders from a criminal?
What person of worth obeys the commands of murderous tyrants?
It is a disgrace for the French government to circulate in secret a plan for the forced vaccination of the entire population in four months in secure vaccine centers.
This is an act of treachery and perfidy on a scale that cannot be tolerated, not one single day longer.
It is a disgrace to us if we stand by and allow these monstrous killing zones to appear in our midst - and to start to operate in our midst in whichever country we live in.
It is a disgrace to us if we allow children and babies as young as six months old to be taken to such “secure vaccine” centers and for their lives to be destroyed under our eyes as we go about our daily business averting our eyes. It is a shame to every adult now alive in North America and Europe today.
Enough is enough.
We have a responsibility to take action to restore law and justice in our societies.
If we want to see enlightened, sensible government, we have a responsibility to see that it becomes a reality ourselves.
The days of criticizing governments are over: the time for toppling these criminals from their seats of power has come.
The days of going to vote in manipulated elections that bring no change are over. The time to take back our governments has come. The time to actually choose our leaders is here.
The days of reading the censored media is over; the time for thinking for ourselves has arrived.
We do not want a revolution of the kind proposed by the likes of Rothschild’s agent such as Olivier Besancenot, the so-called postman in France, groomed by the Rothschild’s to be another Stalin or Hitler. We do not want to swap tyranny for another tyranny, one criminal for another criminal.
We want a government that is founded on wisdom, love, justice and on the rule of law, that guards the treasures of very land, its people and its culture, and we will not tolerate the divide and rule tricks of this criminal gang any longer.
We want a genuine democracy in its original sence of the word, a living dialogue about how to shape our political, educational, health and economic structures so that they bring tangible benefits to all people, the humanity and the whole planet.
We want mechanisms that work and that ensure accountability from those in power, high ethics, competence and skill.
We want an end to the robbery by the banks and their allies in government of our real money - tax money, our savings and our pensions - by their financial manipulations that drive us into poverty and never ending debt.
We must take upon ourselves the responsibility for ensuring just such a government is in place. We have to be ready to fight.
It is up to us to display in our actions the honesty, energy, dynamism and principals that we wish to see in others.
We must never abrogate our power to criminals parading as our elected representatives again or fall for the tricks of people like Obama, Bush, Merkel, Sarkozy, Brown and Betancourt again.
They all sit around the same table with the Rockefellers and Rothschilds planning how to trick and deceive and destroy us for their profit and power.
We must shake off the habit of slavish deference to the morally depraved who hide behind the colour of their office to carry out robbery and brutal atrocities.
Respect is owed to those who are honest, intelligent and enlightened.
Respect is not owed to the pathological and greedy who parade around with all the symbols of high office, with pomp and ceremony, while planning the mass murder in secret of their own people.
Respect is not owed to people who surround themselves with all the luxury and airs of emperors when they have obtained that office only by bribes, deceit and corruption.
It is a disgrace to us if we allow elected representatives who are just gangsters flaunt before our eyes their corruption and flaunt before our eyes their plot - hatched in the labyrinth of corridors of their banks, corporations and ministries - to murder millions, if not billions of people by means of forced mass vaccination.
It is a disgrace to us that they have been allowed to come this far.
They bribe, blackmail the judges and the police and so turn the system of law and justice into something so corrupt it becomes a danger to us all because it allows these criminals to carry out their plans of genocide with impunity.
They have launched an undeclared biological war against the people of the world – and they must be stopped now before they implement it in just two or three weeks time.
Now is not the time for hesitation, doubts, calculations, fear, despair or nihilism.
Now is the time for forceful action.
Each person alive today has a responsibility they cannot avoid. We are responsible for what we know. For our ignorance we are also responsible.
We are responsible for what we do - and for what we fail to do.
If we do nothing as people are murdered around us, we must bear the guilt.
There are only days or weeks left before this very real catastrophe occurs: in just days and weeks governments around the world plan to implement a mass vaccination programme.
This will at first be voluntary but that will quickly be replaced by physical coercion as time passes and as they trigger a pandemic themselves by injecting their toxins and viruses into the “volunteers” or simply spread another more deadly variant of the virus.
Some experts such as Dr Rebecca Carley say that this huge biological experiment will change the DNA of humanity forever.
Not a minute must be lost.
We must aim at more than stopping this crime, though, by force when necessary.
We must think long term and have as our objective the restoration of our constitutions, our fundamental rights, of a system of justice and law and order that truly work.
Because the same criminal gang has engineered the collapse of our economy for their benefit too, we have to think now about the sound economic policies that reward the creative and hard working and at the same time, we must recognize no civilization worthy of its name which neglects children who are its future, the mothers who must nurture those children or the elderly who are the repository of its experience and links in the chain to our past.
There will be many difficulties, many obstacles ahead, many traps and many agents in our midst creating strife, mystifying us, many so-called saviors like Betancourt and Obama, who are just tools of the crime gang.
But we have history to guide us. We have the example of Claus von Stauffenberg, who risked his life to try to assassinate Adolf Hitler, and then to launch a coup to topple the criminal Nazi government.
We have the example of Antoine Saint Exupery, who in his books such as A Flight to Arras, describes his grueling day to day fight for freedom and the dignity of every single person against the Nazi German tyranny.
Among the most inspiring defenders of freedom and justice are the ancient Greeks and their works are as fresh today as they ere when they were written 2,500 days ago. Who can compare with Plato?
Sophocles play “Antigone” about the need to stand up to those in power who think they are gods and who ignore the most basic tenets of morality is as relevant today as it was when Jean Anouilh reworked it during the second world war.
Everything that is great in the world of art, religion and history is on our side.
But unless we carry that greatness in our hearts and spirits today, and act upon it, our glorious civilization will be lost forever and humanity will be annihilated forever.
All the religions say the same thing: Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Toaism all say the same thing: high ethical conduct and inner spiritual attunement to our Creator are the key to happiness and life.
We were created to honor God, the Creator of our marvelous universe and of us, human beings, gifted with a conscience, intelligence and feelings.
We were not created to honour psychopaths who parade down red carpets with tinkling golden watches and with nothing but treacherous and cruel schemes for destroying us through manipulative treaties such as the Lisbon Treaties, through wars and economic crises.
For us to bow down to such psychopaths is a disgrace.
Enough is enough.
We have to stand up straight and walk the walk like Thomas Jefferson, and not just read about them in history books.
We have to be ready to face death for our right to live in liberty and dignity as our Creator designed us to.
The time for a new era has come in which all the people of the world share in prosperity and justice and peace. And we must build that new era ourselves, and prove ourselves worthy of it by showing courage.
We must display the determination of a Stauffenberg and the compassion of a Saint Exupery.
We must show that compassion and courage today - and not tomorrow.
The lives of countless people depend on us. We must not let them down.
Jane Burgermeister,
6:th of September 2009
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Sept 7, 2009 12:08:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Sept 7, 2009 12:43:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Sept 7, 2009 18:39:40 GMT -5
Here is a real Pharmaceutical-Vaccine Whore
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Sept 10, 2009 18:32:23 GMT -5
www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=24583FDA Accepts Petition to “Stay the Shot” – Citizens Petition Demands Safety Testing FirstPosted by RalphFucetolaJD on 08/31/09 9:30 PM [Older: Media Announcement: Citizens Petition tells FDA - STOP the "Swine Flu" Vaccine Rush to Approval] Natural Solutions Foundation www.HealthFreedomUSA.orgMedia Release "After holding emergency petition from doctors & health freedom groups for nearly 2 weeks, FDA today issued docket number... Petition demands no "Swine Flu" H1N1 Vaccine approval without safety testing..." Washington, August 31, 2009 - Prominent natural health personality Gary Null PhD, joined by renowned doctors such as Rima E. Laibow MD and Tedd Koren DC, along with NGOs (nongovernmental organizations) including Natural Solutions Foundation, Foundation for Health Choice and the Institute for Health Research, submitted an emergency Citizens Petition to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on August 17, 2009. Because the public health issues are so serious, the Petition demands an immediate Stay of any government approval of the "Swine Flu" H1N1 Vaccine without safety testing. The Petitioners further demanded strict warnings regarding the potential dangers of this uninsurable, untested and unproven vaccine which contains dangerous adjuvants such as Mercury, Aluminum and Sqaulene, a substance whose toxicity when injected is well known and which has never before been approved for use in the United States. Injected squalene, in fact, has been denied clinical tests in the US because the FDA reviewers felt that it was too toxic even for testing as part of a vaccine. After sitting on the emergency Petition for nearly two weeks, FDA today issued a docket number, accepting the filing both under 21 CFR 10.30 (Citizen Petition) and 21 CFR 10.35 (Stay of Action). The Docket Number is FDA-2009-P-0418. Citizens' Petitions are grounded in the First Amendment Right to Petition the government for redress of grievances. The Administrative Procedures Act and various agency regulations provide formats for Citizen Petitions and many Agency regulatory actions are initiated as a result of such petitions. Several legal actions have been brought in Federal Court in various states by concerned citizens over the past few weeks, seeking to enjoin forced vaccinations with the untested H1N1 pandemic vaccines. Last week one federal judge denied a bid for a temporary restraining order, but giving the plaintiffs two weeks to submit further evidence of potential harm. Other pending legal actions are awaiting hearings. These other actions, while meritorious, have serious legal flaws which the current Citizens Petition avoids, increasing its chance of success. Taking the initial step of engaging the Agency through a Citizens Petition instead of immediately seeking judicial intervention, as the Petitioners here have done, meets the requirement of Federal Law that Petitioners must "exhaust administrative remedies" before seeking relief in Court. While accepting the filing under the "Stay of Action" regulation, the FDA has indicated that it will not treat the application as an "emergency" which permits the agency to take 180 days to respond, well beyond the targeted time frame for the implementation of widespread vaccination with the untested vaccine, either through compulsory or voluntary vaccination. The Petition asks that no vaccine be approved without adequate safety testing. On July 23, 2009, FDA announced its intent to approve pandemic H1N1 vaccine in the absence of any safety testing. Current tests are for dosage response and employ vaccines which lack squalene and other adjuvants, or immune irritants such as aluminum. Maj. Gen. Albert N. Stubblebine (US Army, Ret.), President of Natural Solutions Foundation remarked, "The FDA just does not get it! Delaying public hearings and failing to take into consideration the considerable dangers of the untested pandemic vaccine shots is simply not acceptable. This is neither an example of "transparent government", nor "change in which we can believe". The Courts will have to determine if the FDA has the authority to act in this manner." The Citizens Petition will be posted at the government's www.Regulations.gov web site within the next few days. In the meantime, a copy has been posted at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org/?p=3314Ralph Fucetola JD, Counsel to the Natural Solutions Foundation and primary author of the Petition amplified General Stubblebine's comments: "For over one hundred years, since the case of Jacobson v Commonwealth, the Federal Courts have been available to challenge inappropriate FDA approval of dangerous drugs, including vaccines. We are confident that Federal judicial authority will tell the FDA that it cannot approve the vaccines without safety testing. No drug can be approved unless there is significant scientific agreement that the benefits outweigh the foreseeable risks. Without safety testing there can be no rational risk/benefit analysis. "Remember the 1976 ‘Swine Flu' vaccine fiasco and the near unleashing of a world-wide Avian Flu pandemic earlier this year by a drug company vaccine ‘accident.' Unleashing an untested vaccine on the world is tantamount to engaging in a terrorist act that will result in just the pandemic the authorities claim they want to avoid. "I know there are Federal Judges with the courage to stop this headlong rush to disaster. Unlike the FDA with its drug-company-employee revolving door policy, the Federal Courts are not afraid to confront failures of the Agency to adhere to the law. We will know in a few days if the Courts will ‘Stay the Shot' since, in the words of the Supreme Court in the 1905 Jacobson case, ‘...if it be apparent or can be shown with reasonable certainty that ... vaccination... would seriously impair ...health or probably cause ...death.' the Courts will act." Dr. Rima E. Laibow, MD, the Natural Solutions Foundation's Medical Director emphasized the seriousness of the dangers from the H1N1 vaccines: "Never before has squalene been approved for use in a drug in the United States. But once before, when it was allowed in certain military vaccines, more than 60,000 soldiers were hospitalized because of being injected with it in a condition widely known as "Gulf War Syndrome". A Federal Court, in 2004, forbade its involuntary use by United States troops (Doe v Rumsfeld, Civil Action No. 03-707 USDC for District of Columbia). "This new vaccine has, literally, 1,000,000 times more squalene than that experimental military vaccine, known as "Vaccine A" had. The attempt to rush this dangerous vaccine into the bodies of the public without safety testing is a violation of US law, regulation and medial ethics and must be condemned." The Foundation and its allies promise further action to "Stop the Shot!" They urge all concerned persons to go to the following web page to register their support for the Citizens Petition: www.HealthFreedomUSA.org/?p=3312Donations to support this action may be made at: www.HealthFreedomUSA.org/?p=189Natural Solutions Vaccine Portal: www.HealthFreedomUSA.org/?p=3085Free-Press-Release.com link: www.free-press-release.com/news-fda-accepts-petition-to-stay-the-shot-citizens-petition-demands-safety-testing-first-1251765070.html
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Sept 15, 2009 11:22:43 GMT -5
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15092Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu VaccinesVaccines which have been approved by the responsible government authorities for vaccination against the alleged H1N1 Influenza A Swine Flu have been found to contain nano particles. Vaccine makers have been experimenting with nanoparticles as a way to “turbo charge” vaccines for several years. Now it has come out that the vaccines approved for use in Germany and other European countries contain nanoparticles in a form that reportedly attacks healthy cells and can be deadly. In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) announced in an article in the journal, Nature Biotechnology, that they had developed a “nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies.” The article went on to describe the effects of their breakthrough: “At a mere 25 nanometers, these particles are so tiny that once injected, they flow through the skin’s extracellular matrix, making a beeline to the lymph nodes. Within minutes, they’ve reached a concentration of DCs thousands of times greater than in the skin. The immune response can then be extremely strong and effective.” 1 There is only one small problem with vaccines containing nanoparticles—they can be deadly and at the least cause severe irreparable health damage. Nanoparticles, promoted in the mass media as the new wonder revolution of science, are particles that have been produced vastly smaller than deadly asbestos particles which caused severe lung damage and death before being outlawed. Particles at a nano size, (nm = 0,000000001 Meter) fuse together with the membranes of our body cell membranes and, according to recent studies in China and Japan, continuously destroy cells once introduced into the body. Once they interact with the body’s cellular structure, they cannot be removed. Modern medicine euphemistically terms the phenomenon, a continuing infectious reaction. Since the asbestos scandal, it has been established that particles in size a millionth of a meter, because of their enormous attractive force, penetrate all cells, destroying all those they come into contact with. Nanoparticles are far smaller than asbestos fibers. Beijing Tests confirm deadly effects on humans The fact that WHO, the European Medicines Evaluation Agency, the German Robert Koch Institute and other health bodies today would permit the population to be injected with largely untested novel vaccines containing nanoparticles says more about the powerful pharma lobby in Euiropean politics than it does about the sanity or moral integrity of the civil servants responsible for health of the general public. The September 2009 issue of the respected European Respiratory Journal, made public on 19 August, and available since 21 August online, contains a peer-reviewed article with the title, “Exposure to nanoparticles is related to pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma.” The article describes tests carried out in 2008 at the elite Beijing Chaoyang Hospital on seven young women. All seven, ages 18-47 had been exposed to nanoparticles for 5–13 months in their common workplace. All were admitted to the hospital with shortness of breath and pleural effusions, or excessive fluids surrounding the lungs, inhibiting breathing. None of the seven had ever smoked and none were in any special risk group. Doctors carefully tested for every possibility and confirmed that the lung problems had a common origin—regular inhalation of nanoparticles in their factory. They had been exposed to Polyacrylat nanoparticles. The tests confirmed the nanoparticles had set off a “super-meltdown” reaction in the patients. Despite all heroic efforts of doctors, two of the seven died from the lung complications. 2 In their report, the scientists concluded something so alarming it is necessary to quote at length: “Immunological tests, examinations of bacteriology, virology and tumour markers, bronchoscopy, internal thoracoscopy and video-assisted thoracic surgery were performed. Surveys of the workplace, clinical observations and examinations of the patients were conducted. Polyacrylate, consisting of nanoparticles, was confirmed in the workplace. Pathological examinations of patients' lung tissue displayed nonspecific pulmonary inflammation, pulmonary fibrosis and foreign-body granulomas of pleura. Using transmission electron microscopy, nanoparticles were observed to lodge in the cytoplasm and caryoplasm of pulmonary epithelial and mesothelial cells, but are also located in the chest fluid. These cases arouse concern that long-term exposure to some nanoparticles without protective measures may be related to serious damage to human lungs.“3 To date Animal studies and in vitro experiments show that nanoparticles can result in lung damage and other toxicity in animals, but no reports on the clinical toxicity in humans due to nanoparticles prior to the Beijing study had been made. The Beijing Chaoyang Hospital study has now conclusively confirmed that nanoparticles cause lung damage and other toxicity in humans as well. At this point in time, when two of the approved vaccines planned to be mass distributed in Germany and elsewhere contain nanoparticles, failure of the relevant responsible public health and epidemiology officials to order an immediate emergency freeze on distribution of any vaccine containing nanoparticles can only be considered tantamount to criminal negligence. Hopefully the responsible authorities will react in time to avert a possible human health catastrophe orders of magnitude worse than the worst case of Swine Flu reported to date. F. William Engdahl is author of Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order. He may be reached via his website, www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Sept 19, 2009 13:58:39 GMT -5
rense.com/general87/len.htmLen Horowitz - Pandemic Charges Filed With FBI In NYC9-17-9 LOS ANGELES, CA -- Drug-industry investigators have uncovered documents exposing an international drug ring, operating from New York City, is behind the H1N1 swine flu fright and vaccination preparations. Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz and Sherri Kane, an investigative journalist, have released evidence in legal affidavits that leaders of a private global biotechnology "trust" are behind the pandemic flu, including its origin and alleged prevention via vaccinations. Their documents, being sent by attorneys to the FBI this week, evidence industrialists are operating a crime ring within the "Partnership for New York City" (PNYC), and are behind the pandemic's creation, media persuasions, vaccination preparations, and health official promotions. "David Rockefeller's trust, that engages several powerful partners on Wall Street, including media moguls Ruppert Murdock, Morton Zuckerman, Thomas Glocer, and former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Jerry Speyer, are implicated in advancing global genocide," Dr. Horowitz wrote to FBI directors. "This 'partnership' controls biotechnology research and development globally. Health commerce internationally is also controlled virtually entirely by this trust that also exercises near complete control over mainstream media to promote/propagandize its products and services for the drug cartel's organized crime. This trust, in essence, makes or breaks medical and natural healing markets, primarily through the mass media companies and propaganda it wields for social engineering and market building," Dr. Horowitz wrote. Among the revelations from the Horowitz-Kane research are those linking Larry Silverstein of Silverstein Properties, Inc., and the 9-11 terrorist attacks, to the drug cartel's geopolitical, economic, and population reduction activities. Mr. Silverstein, leaser of the World Trade Center who authorized to have Building-7 "pulled" [detonated] is a chief suspect in the "9-11 truth" investigation. Silverstein is currently landlord and co-partner in the biotechnology trust founded by David Rockefeller and implicated by these new discoveries. Given the unprecedented nature and urgency of these findings, Dr. Horowitz has posted his affidavit for public review on FLUscam.com, hoping wide spread dissemination will prompt governments worldwide to cease mass vaccination preparations to avoid becoming accessories. "The last time I contacted the FBI I warned them about the impending anthrax attacks one week before the first mailings were announced in the press," Dr. Horowitz recalled. "It took them 6 months to respond. When they did, they made me a suspect in the mailings. This time I am warning the Justice Department a month before the deadliest genocide in history. I'm praying they'll take kindly to my appeal for a PNYC investigation, and Court-ordered injunction, to stop the vaccinations for public protection." Release: No. H1N1-15 Contact: Rob Potter 959 715-1520 or 310-877-5002
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Sept 20, 2009 23:03:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Thetaloops on Sept 22, 2009 21:34:21 GMT -5
They say the devil is in the details, well here is some uncomfortable details about our newest emergency vaccine H1N1, here are the ingredients: * aluminum hydroxide* aluminum phosphate* ammonium sulfate* amphotericin B * animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain, dog kidney, monkey kidney, * chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg* calf (bovine) serum* betapropiolactone * fetal bovine serum* formaldehyde* formalin* gelatin* glycerol * human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue) * hydrolized gelatin* mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r)) * monosodium glutamate (MSG)* neomycin* neomycin sulfate* phenol red indicator * phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)* potassium diphosphate* potassium monophosphate * polymyxin B* polysorbate 20* polysorbate 80 * porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein* residual MRC5 proteins* sorbitol * tri(n)butylphosphate, * VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and * washed sheep red blood * MF-59 - Squalene This is a nice little vat of poison. No thanks, I'll pass on this one. Let's depopulate and make money at the same time. Some Master Plan?
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Sept 22, 2009 21:46:44 GMT -5
This is a nice little vat of poison. No thanks, I'll pass on this one.
|
|
|
Post by chickenlittle on Oct 2, 2009 13:55:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Oct 3, 2009 18:09:34 GMT -5
That guy is a animatron, right? What a dope. She says that the track record is bad of the FDA, and she did research, and he keeps repeating the same thing over and over that she didn't do research. She should have asked, "Did you do your research?". Of course, the wooden Indian would have said, "I trust the government?"
Stupid ass this Shepard Smith.
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Oct 9, 2009 17:23:02 GMT -5
www.theflucase.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=881%3Athe-public-relations-machien-for-the-qswine-fluq-jab-vaccine-complex-and-the-cdc-richard-gale-and-gary-null-report&catid=1%3Alatest-news&Itemid=64&lang=enThe Public Relations Machine for the Vaccine Complex, the role of the CDCby Richard Gale and Gary Null One hard lesson we should have learned after Wall Street’s collapse and the government’s handling of the bailout is that there is no reason, whatsoever, for us to sacrifice our good faith and trust in former bankers who now run the Treasury and Federal Reserve. And now as the flu season gets ready to kick off amidst much fanfare and predictions of doom due to a new H1N1 influenza virus, there is emerging sufficient information to raise very serious doubts whether our nation’s health authorities are truly serving the public health instead of commercial interests. If the flu season goes according to schedule, the vaccine industrial complex will be poised to join Wall Street for record year rip-off profits. We will also likely witness huge Pharma executive bonuses and perhaps gold-plated toilets. Even if the CDC statisticians’ crystal ball used to forecast rampant swine flu infections turns into a complete bust—which would only be one more added to many other failed flu predictions back to 1976—it will nevertheless be a very profitable failure as was the economic collapse for the banking cartel. The vaccine industry has now received orders in the range of 3 billion doses during the course of the coming flu season. The World Health Organization would like to vaccinate two thirds (4 billion) of the global community, and the US alone is spending $2 billion to stockpile the nation with upwards to 250 million doses. In the US, such profits could never be accomplished without a dynamic, marketing initiative to convince Americans that vaccines will keep them protected and alive. And what better public relations machine for the vaccine complex, and all its supporters in health insurance and professional medical institutions, than our very own Centers for Disease Control and the Department of Health and Human Services. Even better, our tax dollars are there to pay for it all. We pay for the comfort in knowing that the CDC’s disinformation campaign will continue to scare us over the major networks and the New York Times. We can also assure vaccine makers that once and for all they are protected from liability in the event of serious flu vaccine injuries. Nevertheless, the government has a lot of vaccine vials to distribute, therefore, the CDC needs to sustain the fiction of numerous elderly dying in nursing homes, unvaccinated pregnant moms and children facing life threatening complications, and scores of sick and dead burnt into our national subconscious. It is all part of the CDC’s script to get citizens rushing to their doctors and Wal-Marts to be vaccinated. Peter Doshi, while at Harvard in the mid-2000s, published a devastating study in the British Medical Journal that systematically unveils the flawed predictive science used to publicize our health agencies’ influenza statistics and mortality rates. His analysis shook up enough health authorities to warrant twelve scientists from the CDC and National Institutes of Health to unsuccessfully take him on. Now at MIT, Doshi continues his analysis of a century’s worth of influenza mortality data and government manipulation of influenza data, such as the annual figure of 36,000 influenza deaths we hear and read repeatedly.[1] Although this magical number was for all practical purposes alchemically conjured up via mathematical modeling back in 2003, it continues to be the most holy number in the CDC’s PR vocabulary every flu season. Doshi draws the conclusion, published in the American Journal of Public Health, that commercial interests are playing the role of science in both industry and government.[2] Deconstruction of the CDC’s cherry-picked science and a growing anti-vaccination community are just some of the obstacles health authorities face. Therefore, no public relations strategy can have a solid multimedia punch on American citizens without opinion leaders serving as the gnomes for the vaccine complex and our heavily invested government health agencies, which are about to be buried in millions of purchased vaccine vials eager for distribution. This effort requires shock troopers, such as the pro-vaccine prophet Dr. Paul Offit, the creator of the rotavirus vaccine and a staunch critic against any scientist who discovers an association between vaccines and severe neurological disorders. Dr. Offit is on record for an audacious comment that children can tolerate 100,000 vaccinations (yes, you read that number correctly).[3] However, during this particular flu season, government health officials’ may have a more difficult time convincing Americans to be vaccinated for swine flu if recent polls are reliable indicators. The latest Consumers Union poll released on September 30 shows almost two-thirds of parents will withhold vaccinating their children; fifty percent of respondents’ rationale is that the vaccine has not been tested thoroughly for safety.[4] A poll of pregnant mothers conducted by the internet parent support group Mumsnet.com indicates women are turning more suspicious about the flu vaccine’s true efficacy and safety. The survey of 1500 respondents found only 6 percent of pregnant women “definitely” taking the shot, while 48 percent said they “definitely” wouldn’t. A parallel poll revealed only 5 percent would definitely vaccinate their children.[5] A more recent San Francisco Chronicle survey finds 54 percent saying the H1N1 flu is nothing to be worried about.[6] A separate study conducted by Harvard’s School of Public Health showed that among the 41 percent who would not get the shot, 44 percent of parents are uncertain they would allow their children to receive it. Aside from many who expressed a fear of the vaccine’s side effects, the poll found 31 percent expressing a distrust in our public health officials providing accurate information on vaccine safety.[7] Therefore, expect an aggressive government public relations campaign during the coming weeks and even months, while our tax dollars are spent on 250 million shots that independent epidemiological evidence is showing may be ineffective at best, and dangerous at worst. European polls indicate that our neighbors on the other side of the great pond are less nervous about the H1N1 strain’s severity and far more suspicious towards health officials’ rationale for hyping dire warnings of swine flu’s dangers. In France, Le Figaro conducted a poll of 12,050 people showing 69 percent will refuse the vaccination. In a separate French survey, one third of 4,752 doctors, nurses and healthcare workers surveyed would not be inoculated.[8] Twenty-nine percent of Germans surveyed said they would refuse it “under any circumstance” and an additional 33 percent would likely refuse it. In the region of Bavaria and Baden Wurttemburg, only 10 percent of those polled said they would submit their arms to injection. In the UK, a couple polls reported in the Daily Mail last August, showed half of family physicians and a third of UK nurses do not want the swine flu vaccination. Seventy-one percent do not believe the vaccine has been tested enough for safety and the swine flu is much milder than health authorities are saying. During the course of the CDC’s media war to push forward the vaccine industry’s greed for profit, science and reflective caution are being sacrificed. An important peer-reviewed study appearing in the June 2009 issue of Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry shows a causal relationship between the amounts of ethylmercury (thimerosal) found in inoculations for infants, when administered to monkeys, and cellular toxicity resulting in mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired oxidative reduction activity and degeneration and death in neuronal and fetal cells.[9] These are all indicative signs found in some ASD. But health officials prefer to ignore such results. For the future health of American children, the study’s findings arrive at a bad time when a recent Harvard study now reports autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) has risen to 1 in 91 people compared to the earlier 1 in 150 estimate. But since the study was sponsored by the CDC, the press release makes no indication that just maybe the over-vaccination of children with dozens of injections by the age of 5 years might be a causal factor behind this national epidemic of ASD and other neurological disorders. During the course of interviewing many parents of autistic children for our documentaries Vaccine Nation and Autism: Made in the USA, the personal stories we filmed repeatedly were that of a once perfectly healthy and joyful child who, shortly after a vaccination or a series of injections, simply vanished from normality. However, national health policy today seems to have almost legislated by divine decree that there is no relationship between vaccine ingredients and autism. Besides, further independent research and first-hand personal stories would only interfere with the propaganda machine and the CDC’s “Seven Step Recipe for Generating Interest In, and Demand for, Flu Vaccination.” Peter Doshi first brought public attention to the CDC’s PR influenza strategy known as the Seven Step Recipe. Glen Nowak, now the Director of the CDC’s Media Relations, outlined a concise public relations template while serving as the communications spokesperson for the National Immunization Program. Speaking at the 2004 National Influenza Vaccine Summit, he presented the CDC’s seven steps. After a careful review of Nowak’s Powerpoint presentation we discover a very detailed and concerted PR and multimedia campaign that includes the following (quotes are from CDC’s materials): • To encourage the belief that influenza infection can “occur among people for whom influenza is not generally perceived to cause serious complications (e.g., children, healthy adults, healthy seniors).” In other words, promote flu vaccination to those who don’t really need it. • In order to “foster the demand for flu vaccinations” the CDC should target “medical experts and public health authorities publicly (e.g., via media) [to] state concern and alarm (and predict dire outcomes)—and urge influenza vaccination.” • By focusing on the message of dire health threats and human casualties upon those who don’t really need to be vaccinated, the CDC will reach its milestone of “framing of the flu season in terms that motivate behavior (e.g., as “very severe,” “more severe than last or past years,” “deadly”).” • Throughout the flu season, the campaign would continue issuing reports “from health officials and media” to emphasize that “influenza is causing severe illness and/or affecting lots of people—helping foster the perception that many people are susceptible to a bad case of influenza.” • Of course, no marketing strategy is thorough without images. Ergo another ingredient in the recipe is to use “visible/tangible examples of the seriousness of the illness (e.g., pictures of children, families of those affected coming forward) and people getting vaccinated (the first to motivate, the latter to reinforce).” The CDC’s “key points” indicate we are now in that critical timeframe for the CDC to distribute materials to “a variety of partners.” This includes aggressively disseminating all medical reports, studies and PR spins to the soporific media and corporate-funded medical associations to support the government’s mass vaccination efforts. Come November, we will begin to see reports on “pediatric deaths” due to influenza—although Dr. Martin Meltzer, a CDC expert in health economics, has stated “almost nobody dies of the flu” and “deaths [are] associated with flu, but not necessarily caused by flu.”[10] Apparently, the folks over in the various CDC departments and our different federal health agencies don’t communicate with each other very well. So why should our tax dollars go towards fabricating and/or ignoring science in order to vaccinate Americans? Nowak publicly stated the CDC’s reasons on National Public Radio, “… the manufacturers were telling us that they weren’t receiving a lot of orders for vaccine for use in November or even December … It really did look like we [CDC] needed to do something to encourage people to get a flu shot.[11] At this moment, we are witnessing a steady flow press releases and articles in the media to convert Americans to the wisdom of national health vaccination policy. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) has issued preliminary positive results from an uncompleted clinical trial testing the H1N1 vaccine on children and young people between 6 months and 17 years of age. The fact that the entire study only enrolled 70 individuals covering this age range should alone raise red flags about any reliable conclusions after the study is completed. Moreover, the study is specifically designed for measuring the necessary immune response to protect youth from the swine flu. It is not a safety study. We usually expect that sound scientific ethics demand clinical trials to be reported after a final analysis of research data, however, the CDC’s Seven Step Recipe is not concerned with scientific facts, or rigorous research protocol. It is simply part of the PR game plan to get people vaccinated and to do it fast. Donald McNeil, a shill for the vaccine complex writing for the New York Times has printed two recent articles aligned with CDC propaganda. He quotes Dr. Jay Butler, chief of the swine flu vaccine task force at the CDC in order to relieve fears about flu vaccine adverse effects, especially to pregnant women. Dr. Butler said, “There are about 2,400 miscarriages a day in the US. You’ll see things that would have happened anyway. But the vaccine doesn’t cause miscarriages. It also doesn’t cause auto accidents, but they happen.”[12] I hope that is reassuring to all those expectant mothers across the country, especially since none of the approved H1N1 vaccines have undergone rigorous clinical safety trials on pregnant women or the potential adverse effects of mercury-laced vaccines and other ingredients, such as spermacide, detergent and cosmetics, on the developing fetus. Germany on the other hand announced it is now taking preventative measures. Agreeing that the verdict on ethylmercury and squalene safety for children is unsettled, Germany is requiring the vaccine industry to return to their plants and provide adjuvant- and mercury preservative-free vaccine lots. McNeil’s more recent article in October 7th’s New York Times should be read alongside the Seven Step Recipe for a clear visual unfolding of the CDC’s PR strategy in action. McNeil downplays the growing medical realization that the swine flu is in all likelihood much milder than seasonal flu in order to convince us to roll up our sleeves. Following the CDC script, we see the picture of little 3 year old Clayton being vaccinated, while McNeill compares the swine flu death of an 18 year old Tibetan woman in China with a story of joyful young Brandon and his 9 year old sister gleefully surrendering their nostrils for a blast of live-attenuated H1N1 virus.[13] While finalizing this article, Peter Doshi replied to an email and drew attention to an event in his Harper’s article that should force us to pause before rolling up our sleeves. Briefly, the 2004 flu season was a debacle for the vaccine complex and federal health officials after 50 million doses of flu vaccine promised by Chiron Corporation were made unavailable, therefore, putting the health industry into a panic. In order to lessen the frenzy previously stirred by its public fear tactics, the CDC downgraded the flu’s urgency to “an annoying illness”, and “stressed the protective benefits of regular hand washing.”[14] Now that is a national policy I can support. I would much prefer the CDC funding Americans’ soap bills to ward off an uncertain swine flu pandemic rather than using taxes for unsubstantiated threats from the CDC’s national vaccine marketing campaign. Richard Gale is the Executive Producer of the Progressive Radio Network and a former Senior Research Analyst in the genomic industry. Dr. Gary Null is the host of the nation’s longest running public radio program on nutrition and natural health and a multi-award-winning director of progressive documentary films, including Vaccine Nation and Autism: Made in the USA. Notes [1] Doshi, Peter. “Viral Marketing: The Selling of the Flu Vaccine.” Harpers Magazine. March. 2006. [2] “MIT grad student’s study challenges notions of pandemic flu” MIT Tech Talk. April 16, 2008. [3] Kalb, Claudia. “Stomping through a medical minefield” Newsweek. October 25, 2008. [4] “Majority of US parents wary of H1N1 vaccine: poll” Reuters Health. October 1, 2009. [5] www.mumsnet.com [6] Allday, Erin. “Swine flu draws a shrug, field poll shows.” SF Gate. October 6, 2009. [7] “Just 40 percent of adults ‘absolutely certain’ they will get H1N1 vaccine, survey finds” Science Daily. October 2, 2009. [8] “Grippe A: des blouses blanches anti-vaccin” SFR, France. September 18, 2009 info.sfr.fr/france/grippe-a-des-blouses-blanches-anti-vaccin,115335 [9] Geier D, King P, Geier M. “Mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired oxidative-reduction activity, degeneration, and death in human neuronal and fetal cells induced by low level exposure to thimerosal and other metal compounds.” Toxicology and Environmental Chemistry. Volume 91, Issue 4, June 2009. [10] Manning, Anita. “Study: Annual flu death toll could be overstated.” USA Today. December 11, 2005. [11] Doshi, Peter. “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” BMJ 2005; 331:1412 (10 December) [12] McNeil, Donald. “Don’t blame flu shots for all ills, officials say” New York Times. September 28, 2009. [13] McNeil, Donald. “Swine flu vaccinations start as officials attack myths.” New York Times. October 7, 2009. [14] Doshi, Peter. “Viral Marketing: The Selling of the Flu Vaccine.” Harpers Magazine. March. 2006.
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Oct 13, 2009 19:42:49 GMT -5
www.theflucase.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1000%3Avaccine-revolt-mike-adams-reports&catid=1%3Alatest-news&Itemid=64&lang=enVaccine revolt! Swine flu vaccine support crumbles as flimsy rationale for H1N1 shots becomes apparentMike Adams Natural News Monday, Oct 12th, 2009 Public support for the swine flu vaccine is evaporating by the day as the rationale for the vaccine appears increasingly ludicrous to anyone paying attention. Moms, nurses, day care workers and members of the general public are increasingly realizing that Big Pharma’s rationale for swine flu vaccination just doesn’t add up. Recent polls conducted by the mainstream media indicate that more than fifty percent of moms are refusing to expose their children to the swine flu vaccine, and nurses and health practitioners across the US and UK are going vocal with their opposition to the vaccine. Legal action against the FDA’s approval of the swine flu vaccine is already underway (http://www.naturalnews.com/027205_v…), and public protests are gaining momentum in raising awareness about the primary objections to the swine flu vaccine. Intelligent, informed people everywhere are saying NO to this vaccine! Popular support for the vaccine is crumbling by the day, and health authorities are now turning to exaggerated scare stories to try to drum up demand for their vaccines. Where scientific credibility is lacking, fear is being invoked in its place. Why the swine flu vaccine doesn’t add up So why is the justification for the swine flu so flimsy? It all comes down to these five crucial reasons being pushed by the vaccine industry… but as you’ll see below, each of these five reasons is demonstrably false! Reason #1) The H1N1 swine flu pandemic is dangerous and deadly! Why it’s flimsy: While the infection rate of H1N1 is currently high, the fatality rate is remarkably low. In fact, it’s no higher than a normal, seasonal flu. Reason #2) The vaccine protects you from the virus! Why it’s flimsy: There is absolutely no scientific evidence demonstrating that the swine flu vaccine offers real-world protection against the circulating H1N1 virus. While there is evidence showing that it produces antibodies, as people who have studied vaccine effectiveness already know, the mere existence of vaccine-induced antibodies doesn’t directly translate into functional, real-world immunity! Vaccines are often, in effect, fabricated immunity that often don’t provide practical immune defense in the real world. Reason #3) The vaccine is perfectly safe, even for kids! Why it’s flimsy: This reason is truly laughable. None of these vaccines have been properly safety tested by the FDA or the drug companies. They were approved by the FDA with a waiver, utterly bypassing the normal process of long-term safety testing that the public expects the FDA to enforce. In fact, according to attorney Jim Turner, the FDA’s baseless approval of these swine flu vaccines is a violation of federal law. (http://www.naturalnews.com/027205_v…) Reason #4) There’s nothing else you can do to protect yourself from the swine flu (therefore you must take the vaccine shot). Why it’s flimsy: This reason is an outright lie. In order to sell more vaccines, the pharmaceutical industry (and all its bureaucratic cohorts at the CDC and WHO) are intentionally keeping people ignorant of far safer and more effective options such as vitamin D and anti-viral herbal remedies. Reason #5) If you don’t take the vaccine shot, you’re being unethical by placing the shot burden on everyone else without taking it yourself. Why it’s flimsy: Hilarious! This is marketing by guilt — trying to arm-twist people into the vaccine shot by making them feel guilty if they don’t. The truth is that you’re being unethical if you DO get the shot because you’re financially supporting a dangerous and highly deceptive vaccine industry that’s causing tremendous harm to children, expectant mothers and other innocent vaccination victims. Hoping to improve your health by handing money to the pharmaceutical industry through the purchase of vaccines is sort of like hoping to create world peace by writing a check to weapons manufacturers. No good reason to get the vaccine Is there any good reason to get the swine flu vaccine? Not based on the current situation, no. Unless you have a strong desire to play Russian Roulette with your health, of course. Of course, if things dramatically change, there could be increasingly strong reasons for considering a vaccine. If the H1N1 virus mutates into a virus with a very high fatality rate, things might be different. If the vaccine were proven safe with adequate long-term testing, that would be something working in its favor. If the vaccines were scientifically shown to actually protect you from the virus, then that would be different, too. But to date, none of these things are verifiably true! The vaccines haven’t been properly tested at all. There’s no honest evidence demonstrating that they protect you from the swine flu. And the flu has such a low fatality rate, why does a vaccine matter in the first place? Keep in mind that over 2,000 people die each year from taking aspirin. Over 100,000 Americans are killed each year from taking doctor-prescribed, FDA-approved prescription drugs. If the people at the CDC are looking for a pandemic, they should be focusing on the pandemic of disease mongering and pharmaceutical pushing that’s taking place across the world right now in the context of the swine flu pandemic. There is a real pandemic afoot, though… a pandemic of B.S. running rampant across America and the UK. It’s an infectious form of pharmaceutical quackery that spreads from one person to another at the speed of propaganda. Symptoms of infection include a loss of rational thinking, swine flu hysteria and an irrational belief in symbols of authority. What we really need in America is a vaccine that protects consumers’ brains from infectious pharmaceutical quackery. Then again, if we actually injected people with that, the whole drug industry would collapse overnight. That’s because Big Pharma runs on propaganda. And the propaganda we’re seeing with this swine flu vaccine push is so thick with unjustifiable speculation that it probably deserves a Nobel Peace Prize or something.
|
|
|
Post by chickenlittle on Oct 15, 2009 21:43:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Oct 15, 2009 22:45:35 GMT -5
That is very sad.... I always like this "extremely rare" bullshit. I got polio from the vaccine, children getting autism, young women paralyzed and dying from Gardasil, and I watch my father-in-law get the flu every year after taking the flu shot. This is why they want to destroy the vitamin and herb industry, so there would be no alternatives to these poison. Imagine injecting mercury into a pregnant woman? Check this out: www.theflucase.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1100%3Adeaths-in-china-from-flu-vaccine&catid=41%3Ahighlighted-news&Itemid=105&lang=enDeaths in Korea from Flu VaccinationSeo Ji-eun JoongAng Daily October 15, 2009 Five people have died after being vaccinated against seasonal influenza since the nation’s health authority began providing free shots on the first day of this month. Yesterday, an 80-year-old woman died slightly more than one hour after receiving the seasonal flu shot in Ulsan, according to the public health center in the northern part of the port city. On her way from the center in the morning, she experienced a breathing problem and fell to the ground, her daughter-in-law reported. She was immediately moved to a nearby emergency room but died 75 minutes later. She was diabetic, according to the health center. The center is currently investigating whether the shot played a role in her death. Having secured 3.93 million doses of seasonal flu vaccine, the centers are providing free vaccines to people 65 years and older and to the needy residing in government-provided welfare facilities. A fourth death of a flu shot recipient involved a 51-year-old man from Gyeonggi. Since he was not eligible for the free vaccination due to age, he paid for the shot. He died Oct. 9, two days after the vaccination. The Health Ministry said an autopsy showed he died of hardening of the arteries, not from side effects from the vaccination. However, he had not been treated for heart disease before the shot. The first three deaths occurred three days in a row beginning Oct. 5 – all involving people over 80 years old. Without elaborating further, the Health Ministry said is looking into the “possible link between the deaths and the vaccine.” This is not the first time that deaths have followed flu vaccinations. The largest tally came in 2005 at six, followed by three last year. Of the 3.93 million government-offered free vaccines doses, 3.44 million are from the Green Cross, a local pharmaceutical manufacturer. As a follow-up measure against the recent deaths, the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, an agency under the ministry, advised that those with abnormal physical conditions should postpone the shot even if they are given notice of a free vaccination. They can reschedule later, the agency said. The health agency noted that the seasonal flu shot “won’t prevent the A(H1N1) influenza,” which was originally known as the swine flu. The agency said “healthy adults” need to give preference to senior citizens 65 and older for the seasonal flu vaccine.
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Oct 15, 2009 23:45:16 GMT -5
Good "Novax" video
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Oct 19, 2009 22:01:50 GMT -5
Sixty million years of evolution says vitamin D may save your life from swine flu[/i] by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor (NaturalNews) People still don't get it: Vitamin D is the "miracle nutrient" that activates your immune system to defend you against invading microorganisms -- including seasonal flu and swine flu. Two months ago, an important study was published by researchers at Oregon State University. This study reveals something startling: Vitamin D is so crucial to the functioning of your immune system that the ability of vitamin D to boost immune function and destroy invading microorganisms has been conserved in the genome for over 60 million years of evolution. As this press release from Oregon State University (http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_relea...) explains: The fact that this vitamin-D mediated immune response has been retained through millions of years of evolutionary selection, and is still found in species ranging from squirrel monkeys to baboons and humans, suggests that it must be critical to their survival, researchers say. "The existence and importance of this part of our immune response makes it clear that humans and other primates need to maintain sufficient levels of vitamin D," said Adrian Gombart, an associate professor of biochemistry and a principal investigator with the Linus Pauling Institute at Oregon State University. The announcement goes on to explain: In primates, this action of "turning on" an optimal response to microbial attack only works properly in the presence of adequate vitamin D, which is actually a type of hormone that circulates in the blood and signals to cells through a receptor. Vitamin D is produced in large amounts as a result ofsun exposure, and is available in much smaller amounts from dietary sources. Vitamin D prevents the "adaptive" immune response from over-reacting and reduces inflammation, and appears to suppress the immune response. However, the function of the new genetic element this research explored allows vitamin D to boost the innate immune response by turning on an antimicrobial protein. The overall effect may help to prevent the immune system from overreacting. Without vitamin D, you're a sitting duck What this study reveals is that without sufficient levels of vitamin D circulating in your blood, you're a ripe, juicy target for influenza (H1N1 or otherwise). If you lack vitamin D, your immune system can't "activate" to do its job. That's why people who are deficient in vitamin D so frequently get winter colds. But people who are high in vitamin D have the nutritional power to activate their immune system so that it can respond to invading pathogens. Crucially, vitamin D also manages to balance immune response and prevent inflammation -- the leading cause of death in the 1918 influenza pandemic. So not only does vitamin D protect you from the initial infection; it also prevents your body from over-reacting and killing you with inflammation (which typically gets expressed as bacterial pneumonia, an infection of the lungs). Smart people today are doing two things: 1) Saying NO to vaccines. 2) Saying YES to vitamin D. If you take vitamin D, you don't need a vaccine! Sources for vitamin D Where can you get vitamin D? There's some vitamin D naturally present in fish oils and marine omega-3 oils, but the two most abundant sources are: 1) Sunlight 2) Vitamin D supplements You can get sunlight for free by exposing your skin to the sun. You can get vitamin D supplements at www.Vitacost.com or just about any vitamin retailer (local or online). Vitamin D is easy to get. Your body actually manufactures it when you're exposed to the sun. Why no vitamin D advice? The research supporting vitamin D's ability to halt influenza is overwhelming. And yet the vaccine industry (and the doctors who push vaccines) don't want you to know about vitamin D. Why is that? It's because if people knew the truth about vitamin D, the vaccine industry would collapse. Who needs a vaccine if you're got a powered-up immune system to do the job automatically? Plus, your immune system is natural, while vaccines are completely unnatural injections of toxic chemicals that are increasingly being linked to not just autism, but seizures, brain damage and death. Why risk a vaccine when vitamin D is so remarkably safe? You'll need at least 4000 IU a day just to prevent deficiency, according to many nutrition experts. Some people I know take 8000 IU a day. I personally don't take any vitamin D but I get at least 30 minutes of sunlight every day near the equator (which is a unique geographical situation, I understand, that not everybody can replicate). Our national "health" officials (if you can call them that) are making a crucial mistake with the swine flu. Instead of ordering more vaccines, they should be recommending vitamin D supplements to the population. For less than the cost of the vaccines, we could provide vitamin D supplementation to every man, woman and child in America. We would not only end the swine flu pandemic, we would also see cancer rates plummet! Perhaps that's why our health authorities don't dare recommend vitamin D -- the financial impact on the cancer industry would just be too great. The vaccine makers would lose billions, and the cancer industry could lose tens of billions. Diabetes rates would fall, depression would fade away in many people, kidney function would improve and a long list of other diseases would be prevented or reversed following adequate vitamin D intake. Vitamin D is the answer to our national health care problems. Just one nutrient, if distributed freely to everyone, could probably slash our national health care costs by one-third within five years, I believe. And yet they dare not mention it. "It's not approved by the FDA," they say. So the CDC won't mention it. The WHO won't recommend it. The FDA pretends it doesn't exist, and the doctors aren't allowed to prescribe it. Here it is -- vitamin D -- the great CURE for influenza. It's here right now. It's cheap, it's safe, and it's available. Yet it's being utterly ignored. Let me go on the record to state the obvious: There is an agenda under way to keep the American people deficient in vitamin D and ignorant about its healing properties. This is a conscious, planned scheme that seeks to keep the people disinformed while pumping them full of vaccines, chemotherapy and prescription drugs instead of teaching them the simple nutritional cures that exist right now. Mark my words: With the swine flu or any future pandemic, the populations suffering the highest death rates will be those with the highest rates of vitamin D deficiency. And the vaccine? It offers no protection compared to the power of the vitamin D. The laws of biochemistry cannot be suspended by FDA bureaucrats To any doctor or health authority who scoffs at the notion of vitamin D being far more useful than vaccines, ask them this question: If vitamin D has no purpose in human health, then why have the immune system genes that are specifically activated by vitamin D persisted in the genome (which is now the human genome) for more than sixty million years? Why is the human immune system programmed to use vitamin D to activate itself? Why does human skin generate vitamin D in response to sun exposure? To hear mind-numbed doctors answer it, this is all just coincidence! There is no specific reason that vitamin D genes exist at all! But it gets even more bizarre: According to the FDA, vitamin D has no beneficial biological effects in the human body! It's true: The FDA says that any substance that has a beneficial (therapeutic) effect in the human body must be a DRUG, not a nutrient. And vitamin D has never been approved as a drug. Therefore, it is inert. Do you follow that? Vitamin D has no benefit to the human body because the FDA says so. How's that for bureaucratic arrogance? It's like saying gravity doesn't apply in our world because we haven't yet "approved" the laws of physics. But one step off a high ledge reveals, indeed, that the laws of gravity are still in effect, and so are the laws of biochemistry. You need vitamin D, not a vaccine Your body doesn't need a vaccine to combat the swine flu (or seasonal flu, for that matter). What it needs is vitamin D, restful sleep, adequate hydration with clean water, and good nutrition. These things make the vaccine obsolete. They're safe, affordable, natural and readily available. You don't have to wait in line to get vitamin D, and you don't need a doctor's prescription. There's no needle involved, and there's no risk of you suffering a seizure or permanent brain damage, either. With sufficient levels of vitamin D in your blood, your immune system will do its job to protect you from swine flu, bird flu, human flu or even the pandemic infectious nonsense being spread around by the CDC, FDA and WHO. Your immune system has all the technology it needs right now to keep you alive from almost any widely-circulating microorganism... as long as it has the biochemical tools (like vitamin D) to "activate" its adaptive response. Do you realize that without a functioning immune system, you would have been killed by microorganisms a thousand times over by now? Your immune system saves your life every day, quietly, behind the scenes. It is the reason you're breathing right now as you read this article. Receiving a vaccine injection is the ultimate insult to your own body because it admits that you have no faith in the very same immune system that has already saved your life countless times. Don't put your faith in chemical injections. Believe in your immune system -- and give it the nutritional tools it needs to keep on saving your life. www.naturalnews.com/027231_Vitamin_D_immune_system_vaccines.html
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Oct 24, 2009 14:07:12 GMT -5
www.theflucase.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1339%3Anew-york-drops-mandatory-swine-flu-shots-for-health-workers-after-lawsuit-filed&catid=41%3Ahighlighted-news&Itemid=105&lang=enState ends flu shot mandate Shortage of swine flu vaccine forces end to controversial rule By RICK KARLIN AND SCOTT WALDMAN, Capitol bureau First published: Friday, October 23, 2009 ALBANY -- Citing a shortage of the vaccine, the state Department of Health has ended a mandate that most of the state's health care workers be inoculated against the flu. Gov. David Paterson attributed Thursday's decision to limited supplies of the H1N1 vaccinations, a number of doses far short of the federal government's expected delivery. The decision also tosses out mandated seasonal flu shots. "Over the last week, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention acknowledged that New York would only receive approximately 23 percent of its anticipated vaccine supply by the end of the month," Paterson said in a prepared statement. "As a result, we need to be as resourceful as we can with the limited supplies of vaccine currently coming into the state and make sure that those who are at the highest risk for complications from the H1N1 flu receive the first vaccine being distributed right now in New York state." This summer, the federal government projected 120 million doses would be available by the end of October. This week, the CDC changed expected delivery to just 27.7 million doses. The CDC allowed the state to order only 146,300 doses of vaccine, even though New York's health providers requested more than 1,482,822 doses. The order from Health Commissioner Richard Daines that health care workers who come in contact with patients, including employees of hospitals, receive the vaccine came earlier this fall and has resulted in at least two lawsuits and protests over what many workers claimed was an unfair intrusion on their freedom of choice. Daines presented the measure as a simple matter of due diligence for health care workers, whose presence in hospitals and other facilities brought them into close contact with infants, the elderly and other people whose immune systems might be compromised. Daines said Thursday that it was essential to first get the vaccine to those who need it most. "We had told hospitals that if they had to choose between vaccinating patients or employees to vaccinate patients first," Daines said in a prepared statement. "This week, the CDC confirmed that most of the national supply of seasonal flu vaccine has been distributed, and that H1N1 vaccine distribution is far behind projections. New evidence is showing that H1N1 can be especially virulent to pregnant women and young people – so they should get vaccinated first." One of the lawsuits led to a temporary injunction against the order, which mandated that all health care workers get the shot by Nov. 30 or risk losing their jobs. Opponents of the mandatory shots said they were heartened by the news. "They should" withdraw the mandate, said Kevin McCashion upon hearing the news. The Colonie businessman helped organize a local protest against the mandate. Lorna Patterson, a nurse in the emergency room at Albany Medical Center Hospital, was among a group of health care workers who brought a lawsuit to fight the order. She said late Thursday that she and her fellow nurses were just excited they could concentrate on nursing. She said Paterson recognized the importance of letting people make their own health care decisions. "I'm just glad our health care organizations can function, knowing they have the stuff they need," she said. Terence Kindlon, the Albany attorney who brought one of the lawsuits against the state, said the state decided to act in good faith. He said questions remain about whether or not there is even a health crisis. He said it was unfair to single out a small slice of the population upon which to force an untested vaccination. "I think they tried to sneak this one under the radar," Kindlon said. "The lesson is it's better to play by the rule book." Kindlon said he believes the decision to back off the mandate will end his court case, but some nurses want to prevent any future mandates, which the governor's office left open as a possibility. Sue Field, a Poughkeepsie nurse who filed suit against the rule, said she wants to continue her case in order to get a court decision against the mandatory vaccine. "This is encouraging, but I don't see that at this moment it would stop the lawsuit," she said.
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Oct 24, 2009 14:09:55 GMT -5
So much for New York stopping this insanity. Look at what "Real Change" Obama is doing today!!!!www.modbee.com/breakingnews/story/905914.htmlSaturday, Oct. 24, 2009 Obama declares swine flu a national emergencyBy PHILIP ELLIOTT - Associated Press Writer WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama declared the swine flu outbreak a national emergency, giving his health chief the power to let hospitals move emergency rooms offsite to speed treatment and protect noninfected patients. The declaration, signed Friday night and announced Saturday, comes with the disease more prevalent than ever in the country and production delays undercutting the government's initial, optimistic estimates that as many as 120 million doses of the vaccine could be available by mid-October. Health authorities say more than 1,000 people in the United States, including almost 100 children, have died from the flu, known as H1N1, and 46 states have widespread flu activity. So far only 11 million doses have gone out to health departments, doctor's offices and other providers, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention officials. Obama Obama Swine Flu Swine Flu Swine Flu Swine Flu AP Photo - President Barack Obama arrives on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, Friday, Oct. 23, 2009, after traveling to Boston and Stamford, Conn. Administration officials said the declaration was a pre-emptive move designed to make decisions easier when they need to be made. Officials said the move was not in response to any single development. Health and Human Services chief Kathleen Sebelius now has authority to bypass federal rules when opening alternative care sites, such as offsite hospital centers at schools or community centers if hospitals seek permission. Some hospitals have opened drive-thrus and drive-up tent clinics to screen and treat swine flu patients. The idea is to keep infectious people out of regular emergency rooms and away from other sick patients. Hospitals could modify patient rules - for example, requiring them to give less information during a hectic time - to quicken access to treatment, with government approval, under the declaration. It also addresses a financial question for hospitals - reimbursement for treating people at sites not typically approved. For instance, federal rules do not allow hospitals to put up treatment tents more than 200 yard away from the doors; if the tents are 300 yards or more away, typically federal dollars won't go to pay for treatment. Administration officials said those rules might not make sense while fighting the swine flu, especially if the best piece of pavement is in the middle of a parking lot and some medical centers already are putting in place parts of their emergency plans. The national emergency declaration was the second of two steps needed to give Sebelius extraordinary powers during a crisis. On April 26, the administration declared swine flu a public health emergency, allowing the shipment of roughly 12 million doses of flu-fighting medications from a federal stockpile to states in case they eventually needed them. At the time, there were 20 confirmed cases in the U.S. of people recovering easily. There was no vaccine against swine flu, but the CDC had taken the initial step necessary for producing one. "As a nation, we have prepared at all levels of government, and as individuals and communities, taking unprecedented steps to counter the emerging pandemic," Obama wrote in Saturday's declaration. He said the pandemic keeps evolving, the rates of illness are rising rapidly in many areas and there's a potential "to overburden health care resources." The government now hopes to have about 50 million doses of swine flu vaccine out by mid-November and 150 million in December. The flu virus has to be grown in chicken eggs, and the yield hasn't been as high as was initially hoped, officials have said. "Many millions" of Americans have had swine flu so far, according to an estimate that CDC Director Dr. Thomas Frieden gave Friday. The government doesn't test everyone to confirm swine flu so it doesn't have an exact count. He also said there have been more than 20,000 hospitalizations.
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Oct 27, 2009 8:14:16 GMT -5
"Popular" web sites means sites that give the Truth about this Pandemic Scamwww.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN2620750120091026?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0&sp=trueSEC and Homeland Security need Web backup, GAO saysMon Oct 26, 2009 6:53pm EDT By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Editor WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Securities exchanges have a sound network back-up if a severe pandemic keeps people home and clogging the Internet, but the Homeland Security Department has done little planning, Congressional investigators said on Monday. The department does not even have a plan to start work on the issue, the General Accountability Office said. But the Homeland Security Department accused the GAO of having unrealistic expectations of how the Internet could be managed if millions began to telework from home at the same time as bored or sick schoolchildren were playing online, sucking up valuable bandwidth. Experts have for years pointed to the potential problem of Internet access during a severe pandemic, which would be a unique kind of emergency. It would be global, affecting many areas at once, and would last for weeks or months, unlike a disaster such as a hurricane or earthquake. H1N1 swine flu has been declared a pandemic but is considered a moderate one. Health experts say a worse one -- or a worsening of this one -- could result in 40 percent absentee rates at work and school at any given time and closed offices, transportation links and other gathering places. Many companies and government offices hope to keep operations going as much as possible with teleworking using the Internet. Among the many problems posed by this idea, however, is the issue of bandwidth -- especially the "last mile" between a user's home and central cable systems. "Such network congestion could prevent staff from broker-dealers and other securities market participants from teleworking during a pandemic," reads the GAO report, available here "The Department of Homeland Security is responsible for ensuring that critical telecommunications infrastructure is protected." BLOCKING WEBSITES Private Internet providers might need government authorization to block popular websites, it said, or to reduce residential transmission speeds to make way for commerce. The Financial Services Sector Coordinating Council for Critical Infrastructure Protection and Homeland Security, a group of private-sector firms and financial trade associations, has been working to ensure that trading could continue if big exchanges had to close because of the risk of disease transmission. "Because the key securities exchanges and clearing organizations generally use proprietary networks that bypass the public Internet, their ability to execute and process trades should not be affected by any congestion," the GAO report reads. However, not all had good plans for critical activities if many of their employees were ill, the report reads. Homeland Security had done even less, it said. "DHS has not developed a strategy to address potential Internet congestion," the report said. It had also not even checked into whether the public or even other federal agencies would cooperate, GAO said. "The report gives the impression that there is potentially a single solution to Internet congestion that DHS could achieve if it were to develop an appropriate strategy," DHS's Jerald Levine retorted in a letter to the GAO. "An expectation of unlimited Internet access during a pandemic is not realistic," he added.
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Oct 28, 2009 10:22:31 GMT -5
CDC States H1N1 Vaccine May Maim and Kill 30,000 Americans, FDA Requires Minimal Efficacy
CDC says to assume 1 in every 100,000 vaccine recipients will suffer serious side effects[/size] www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14950by Herb Newborg . Global Research, August 28, 2009 The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has officially stated that there will be as many as 30,000 serious, potentially lethal adverse reactions to the novel H1N1 vaccine, while the FDA guidelines for the novel H1N1 vaccine only require that it work in 3 out of every 10 recipients. Last Saturday, I attended one of 10 “public engagement” meetings the CDC is holding across the country, utilizing a new model of public engagement designed to provide a public viewpoint or societal perspective on the topic at hand (mass vaccination) to the sponsor (in this case, the CDC). Part of the process entails the sponsor (CDC) providing the following: “Information on the many sides of an issue is provided to the participants in a fair and balanced manner so that all participants become well-informed, and the overall group process is convened and managed in a neutral, respectful fashion.” This requirement is met by providing an oral presentation in easy to understand language, a booklet summarizing the key facts needed and a discussion guide summarizing the choices faced. The assembled group of 80 participants was shown a video, given a brief oral presentation and a printed discussion guide. We were asked to accept several assumptions in considering the topic. We were asked to assume that the severity would be similar to what had already been observed in the spring of 2009; we were told to assume that the vaccination program would be voluntary, not mandatory; we were told to assume that initial vaccine supplies will be available in October but supply would be limited through February 2010. The most disturbing assumption we were asked to accept dealt with the safety of the novel H1N1 vaccine. In the video, the CDC spokesperson explained that during the 1976 mass vaccination campaign, 1 in every 100,000 recipients of the vaccine developed Guillain Barré syndrome (GBS), a disorder in which the body's immune system attacks the peripheral nervous system often leading to paralysis and death. There is no known cure for GBS. In 1976 roughly 40 million Americans received the vaccine and some 4,000 developed GBS. The printed material that was distributed reiterated these horrific statistics and we were asked to accept the assumption that, “the estimated risk for more serious reactions (e.g. Guillain Barré syndrome) is between 1-10 per million persons vaccinated”. This is a less direct way of stating that the risk is about the same as existed during the 1976 mass vaccination attempt and that as many as 1 in every 100,000 recipients will develop GBS or some other serious adverse reaction. The CDC is setting up a new intensive surveillance system with which to monitor and track GBS cases that result from the novel H1N1 vaccine. Merriam-Webster defines assumption as a fact or statement taken for granted and assumed to be true. If we accept the documented assumption presented by the CDC, we are to consider it a fact that 1 in every 100,000 vaccine recipients will suffer a serious adverse effect such as GBS. This means that if the entire U.S. population is vaccinated (a stated goal of the CDC), we are to assume as a fact that 30,000 Americans will suffer debilitating or lethal side effects. Apparently the CDC considers this an acceptable level of collateral damage. As unthinkable as this is (destroying or ending the lives of as many as 30,000 Americans), that is only part of the story. The novel H1N1 vaccine being developed must adhere to guidelines set forth by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA has announced that a vaccine will be accepted if it creates antibodies in 4 out of 10 recipients (40%), with at least 70 percent of those 4 achieving an antibody level believed to provide benefit. This means that an acceptable vaccine candidate would provide “protection” for 28% of vaccine recipients (70% of the 40%), or less than 3 in 10 recipients. The requirement drops to 18% efficacy for those over 65 years of age (60% of 30%). So here are the facts, as documented by the CDC and the FDA: As many as 30,000 Americans will be harmed by the novel H1N1 vaccine. The vaccine may be ineffective in more than 7 out of 10 recipients. And in case you think I am alone in my concerns, here is what several vaccine experts associated with the CDC and the U.S. government say on the subject. "I am very skeptical of finishing vaccine before we know the appropriate dose to be included in each inoculation, before immunogenicity studies are complete, or before safety assessments have been finished," William Schaffner, MD, Chairman of the Department of Preventive Medicine at Vanderbilt University and a member of the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), wrote in an recent e-mail. "We have assured both the profession and the public that the H1N1 vaccine will be evaluated with the same rigor that is applied to seasonal vaccine. We should NOT make vaccine available before the trials are complete and the results carefully assessed." Others are worried about a repeat of the last swine flu "pandemic," now regarded as a public health and public relations debacle. "I fear that a rush towards vaccinating the population without completing trials risks leading to the harmful outcome that we witnessed during the 1976 swine flu scare, where the government advocated rapid production and vaccination of the population without adequate safeguards, which led to an unexplained increase in cases of Guillain Barré syndrome (GBS), amongst other complications, and massive liability for the government," wrote Amir Afkhami, MD, PhD, of George Washington University, an international expert on the 1918 Influenza pandemic and an advisor to the U.S. State Department, the U.S. military, and the World Bank on issues pertaining to infectious diseases, public health and, mental health. "I think in this regard, we must learn from lessons of the past and be mindful of not jumping from the proverbial frying pan into the fire by putting people's health at risk without adequate production and safety monitoring of the vaccines."
|
|
|
Post by CDsNuTz on Oct 29, 2009 19:13:22 GMT -5
Sad to say, the majority are falling for the "scam" hook line and sinker. My wife works in pediatrics and people are freaking out..
|
|