Post by Swamp Gas on May 8, 2007 17:11:48 GMT -5
Here we go. The Right-Wing Petro/Neo-Christian/Industrial Machine cranking out it's latest propaganda. This fellow is OK with 9/11, but he and Alex Jones are losing their minds, and perhaps that is the goal. Pianka is the darling of the paranoia crowd. They attempt to tie in every Green Group in the world to this guy. One has to wonder whether all of these "Hippy/Environmentalist Hating Right Wingers" are being funded by Saudi interests, with the help of the CIA. Connecting China's one child policy to Eugenics is a far stretch.
Now, if someone says that 1 billion is the ideal population for the planet, that does not mean to knock off the population. What if every couple had only 1 child? Does that make you a Eugenicist? What if you decide to not have children? This concept of producing as many babies as possible is a veiled Fundamentalist Religious idea. What I also find interesting is they all mock Stephen Hawking when he says perhaps we should migrate to outer space. So their concept is this....Pollute and rape the planet to your hearts content, produce as many babies as possible, every hippy/environmentalist is a New World Order Stooge, Every person should walk around armed, and never, ever look at the CIA's role in the programming and role in 9/11. Perhaps they are working for the CIA.
These Right-Wing Oil Polluting Boys (Jones, Rivero, Watson, Rense, Makow, etc) should stick with 9/11 and political corruption because everything else they post is full of Crap.
www.infowars.com/articles/science/population_enviro_mentalists_call_for_human_population_cull.htm
Enviro Mentalists Call For Culling Of Human Population
Push for Malthusian social control policies in name of curbing carbon emissions
Prison Planet | May 7, 2007
Steve Watson
A disturbing move is afoot by several "green" groups to associate climate change with over population and suggest that the solution is to implement depopulation policies and punishments for those who flout them.
The London Times reports today that a report to be published by green think tank the Optimum Population Trust says that children are 'bad for planet and 'having large families should be frowned upon as an environmental misdemeanour in the same way as frequent long-haul flights, driving a big car and failing to reuse plastic bags.
The paper will say that if couples had two children instead of three they could cut their family's carbon dioxide output by the equivalent of 620 return flights a year between London and New York.
John Guillebaud, co-chairman of OPT and emeritus professor of family planning at University College London, said: "The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights.
In related news Paul Watson (no relation), founder and president of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and famous for militant intervention to stop whalers, now warns mankind is “acting like a virus” and is harming Mother Earth, reports Business & Media Institute .
Watson's May 4 editorial asked the question “The Beginning of the End for Life as We Know it on Planet Earth?” Then he left no doubt about the answer. “We are killing our host the planet Earth,” he claimed and called for a population drop to less than 1 billion.
Watson's eco-extremist stance mirrors that of other Malthusian scientists such as Dr. Eric R. Pianka who gave a speech to the Texas Academy of Science who last year gave a speech in which he advocated the need to exterminate 90% of the population through the airborne ebola virus.
Standing in front of a slide of human skulls, Pianka gleefully advocated airborne ebola as his preferred method of exterminating the necessary 90% of humans, choosing it over AIDS because of its faster kill period. Ebola victims suffer the most tortuous deaths imaginable as the virus kills by liquefying the internal organs. The body literally dissolves as the victim writhes in pain bleeding from every orifice.
Pianka also stated that China's one child policy and its accompanying police state was the perfect model for the rest of the world to follow.
Such chilling comments, and their enthusiastic reception underscore a long term agenda to enact horrifying measures of population control.
We have previously documented the elite's hideous interest in depopulation techniques , an interest that mirrors the nightmare eugenics visions of Nazi scientists in the 1940s.
Pianka even went as far as suggesting that we should begin to sterilize the human population now, a call that has previously been put forward by Henry Kissinger in a declassified document of the National Security Council (1974) entitled "The Implications of World-wide Population Growth on the Security and External Interests of the United States".
This document lists as a priority birth-rate control in 13 key countries in the Third World, especially in South America. Extraordinary resources were allotted to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to implement the policy of birth-rate control.
It also contains sections entitled:
Creating Conditions Conducive to Fertility Decline, which calls for, amongst other things, "reducing infant and child mortality"
Concentration on Education and Indoctrination of The Rising Generation of Children Regarding the Desirability of Smaller Family Size
Utilization of Mass Media and Satellite Communications Systems for Family Planning
The memorandum also includes a section that lauds abortion and states that " -- It would be unwise to restrict abortion research for the following reasons: 1) The persistent and ubiquitous nature of abortion. 2) Widespread lack of safe abortion techniques..."
The memorandum basically stresses the need to offer increased aid for third world countries that agree to implement programs of sterilization and depopulation.
The document contains too many hideous quotes to mention here, read it for yourself by clicking here .
Kissinger also prepared a depopulation manifesto for President Jimmy Carter called 'Global 2000' which detailed using food as a weapon to depopulate the third world.
The United Nations Population Fund directly supports policies such as that of the "one child policy" in Communist China which encapsulates coercive and enforced abortion.
In 2002 Secretary of State Colin Powell stated in a letter to Congress:
"Regrettably, the PRC has in place a regime of severe penalties on women who have unapproved births. This regime plainly operates to coerce pregnant women to have abortions in order to avoid the penalties and therefore amounts to a ‘program of coercive abortion.' Regardless of the modest size of UNFPA's budget in China or any benefits its programs provide, UNFPA's support of, and involvement in, China's population-planning activities allows the Chinese government to implement more effectively its program of coercive abortion.”
Yet The UNPFA seem to think this is a great thing
"China has had the most successful family planning policy in the history of mankind in terms of quantity and with that, China has done mankind a favour," United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) representative Sven Burmester said last week. —10/11/99 Agence France-Presse
Under the Regan Administration legislation sponsored by then- Rep. Jack Kemp (NY) and then-Sen. Bob Kasten (WI) ensured funding to the UNPFA was cut off for these very reasons. Yet is was no surprise when In 1993, the Clinton Administration dramatically revised the official interpretation of the “Kemp-Kasten amendment” in order to facilitate U.S. funding of UNFPA, thus making available $14.5 million.
In May 2003, the House Committee on International Relations narrowly adopted an an amendment by Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-NY) revoking the ban on such participation with the UNPFA. The amendment earmarked $100 million for UNFPA over the next two years.
The BBC today reports that China's top family planning body has warned of a "population rebound" as couples flout the one child policy rules:
In fact, last month, a survey by the National Population and Family Planning Commission found that the number of rich people and celebrities having more than one child was on a rapid increase, and nearly 10% of people in this category had three children.
More affluent people in China are refusing to go along with their masters' orders and would rather pay fines and have more than one child it seems.
There are countless other instances of depopulation programs, too numerous to go into in this brief article. We urge our readers to research them and expose them further.
Another pseudo-scientific fraud for social control
The doomsday warnings of the population bomb are complete pseudo-science. Populations in developed countries are declining and only in third world countries are they expanding dramatically.
Industrialization itself levels out population trends and even despite this world population models routinely show that the earth's population will level out at 9 billion in 2050 and slowly decline after that.
"The population of the most developed countries will remain virtually unchanged at 1.2 billion until 2050," states a United Nations report. The UN population policies seem to be in direct contradiction to THEIR OWN FINDINGS.
Conservation International's own study revealed that 46% of the earth's surface was an untouched wilderness, that is land areas not including sea. It is commonly accepted that the entire world population could all fit into the state of Texas and each have an acre of their own land.
Once a country industrializes there is an average of a 1.6 child rate per household, so the western world population is actually in decline. That trend has also been witnessed in areas of Asia like Japan and South Korea. The UN has stated that the population will peak at 9 billion and then begin declining.
The eco-extremists' comments along with Dr Pianka's ravings are merely echoes of the elite lust for a Malthusian social Darwinist control mechanism. Our global overlords wish to use the excuse of having to "save the earth" in order to take away freedom and implement a massive authoritarian control grid.
Now these people are using the out of control global warming hype to push their insane desire to cull the human population by 5.5 billion and silence anyone who speaks out against them.
We have already seen an overwhelming shift towards the implementation of a global carbon emissions tax , served up as a solution to combat global warming.
In reality the solution does not tackle the problem, it merely enforces control and restriction upon the lives of everyone on the planet.
If western governments were really concerned about climate change then they would be offering us incentives not punishments for reducing CO2 emissions in the form of tax breaks. But tax breaks aren't a giant cash bonanza for our exalted guardians of Mother Earth, the loving government, who are going to tax the living hell out of us for our own good and for the very survival of mankind, while lining their own pockets.
The masses are being indoctrinated in acceptance as they witness elite figures such as the Queen of England on a tour of the US which has been dubbed the "carbon-offset state visit", where a donation is made to an environmental charity to offset the plane journeys made by the royal party.
Here the royals are volunteering to pay a tax which does not even exist yet, in order to travel. People are being shown that this is the way forward and are being told that they are going to have to get used to huge financial burdens in order to curb carbon emissions while in reality the emissions stay uncurbed and other much more pressing environmental issues including industrial emissions of toxic pollutants such as mercury in the air, the dumping of chemical waste into the oceans and the manufacturing of GM crops containing live pesticides take a back seat.
In San Antonio this weekend Al Gore referred continually to a "new way of thinking" that is emerging in the country in the battle to control the effects global warming will have on the planet.
"It's in part a spiritual crisis," Gore told the crowd in the Convention Center at the American Institute of Architects national convention.
Indeed it is, the people are being coerced into a new form of religious worship. They are being told how they must think and what they must accept in order that their future be secure.
The 'enviro mental' movement has hijacked eco groups and activists alike and is pushing a green fraud to mask their agenda to mold a global neo feudalist society where a global body regulates and micro manages every aspect of our lives down to when we can and cannot move around and when we can and cannot reproduce.
Now, if someone says that 1 billion is the ideal population for the planet, that does not mean to knock off the population. What if every couple had only 1 child? Does that make you a Eugenicist? What if you decide to not have children? This concept of producing as many babies as possible is a veiled Fundamentalist Religious idea. What I also find interesting is they all mock Stephen Hawking when he says perhaps we should migrate to outer space. So their concept is this....Pollute and rape the planet to your hearts content, produce as many babies as possible, every hippy/environmentalist is a New World Order Stooge, Every person should walk around armed, and never, ever look at the CIA's role in the programming and role in 9/11. Perhaps they are working for the CIA.
These Right-Wing Oil Polluting Boys (Jones, Rivero, Watson, Rense, Makow, etc) should stick with 9/11 and political corruption because everything else they post is full of Crap.
www.infowars.com/articles/science/population_enviro_mentalists_call_for_human_population_cull.htm
Enviro Mentalists Call For Culling Of Human Population
Push for Malthusian social control policies in name of curbing carbon emissions
Prison Planet | May 7, 2007
Steve Watson
A disturbing move is afoot by several "green" groups to associate climate change with over population and suggest that the solution is to implement depopulation policies and punishments for those who flout them.
The London Times reports today that a report to be published by green think tank the Optimum Population Trust says that children are 'bad for planet and 'having large families should be frowned upon as an environmental misdemeanour in the same way as frequent long-haul flights, driving a big car and failing to reuse plastic bags.
The paper will say that if couples had two children instead of three they could cut their family's carbon dioxide output by the equivalent of 620 return flights a year between London and New York.
John Guillebaud, co-chairman of OPT and emeritus professor of family planning at University College London, said: "The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights.
In related news Paul Watson (no relation), founder and president of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and famous for militant intervention to stop whalers, now warns mankind is “acting like a virus” and is harming Mother Earth, reports Business & Media Institute .
Watson's May 4 editorial asked the question “The Beginning of the End for Life as We Know it on Planet Earth?” Then he left no doubt about the answer. “We are killing our host the planet Earth,” he claimed and called for a population drop to less than 1 billion.
Watson's eco-extremist stance mirrors that of other Malthusian scientists such as Dr. Eric R. Pianka who gave a speech to the Texas Academy of Science who last year gave a speech in which he advocated the need to exterminate 90% of the population through the airborne ebola virus.
Standing in front of a slide of human skulls, Pianka gleefully advocated airborne ebola as his preferred method of exterminating the necessary 90% of humans, choosing it over AIDS because of its faster kill period. Ebola victims suffer the most tortuous deaths imaginable as the virus kills by liquefying the internal organs. The body literally dissolves as the victim writhes in pain bleeding from every orifice.
Pianka also stated that China's one child policy and its accompanying police state was the perfect model for the rest of the world to follow.
Such chilling comments, and their enthusiastic reception underscore a long term agenda to enact horrifying measures of population control.
We have previously documented the elite's hideous interest in depopulation techniques , an interest that mirrors the nightmare eugenics visions of Nazi scientists in the 1940s.
Pianka even went as far as suggesting that we should begin to sterilize the human population now, a call that has previously been put forward by Henry Kissinger in a declassified document of the National Security Council (1974) entitled "The Implications of World-wide Population Growth on the Security and External Interests of the United States".
This document lists as a priority birth-rate control in 13 key countries in the Third World, especially in South America. Extraordinary resources were allotted to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to implement the policy of birth-rate control.
It also contains sections entitled:
Creating Conditions Conducive to Fertility Decline, which calls for, amongst other things, "reducing infant and child mortality"
Concentration on Education and Indoctrination of The Rising Generation of Children Regarding the Desirability of Smaller Family Size
Utilization of Mass Media and Satellite Communications Systems for Family Planning
The memorandum also includes a section that lauds abortion and states that " -- It would be unwise to restrict abortion research for the following reasons: 1) The persistent and ubiquitous nature of abortion. 2) Widespread lack of safe abortion techniques..."
The memorandum basically stresses the need to offer increased aid for third world countries that agree to implement programs of sterilization and depopulation.
The document contains too many hideous quotes to mention here, read it for yourself by clicking here .
Kissinger also prepared a depopulation manifesto for President Jimmy Carter called 'Global 2000' which detailed using food as a weapon to depopulate the third world.
The United Nations Population Fund directly supports policies such as that of the "one child policy" in Communist China which encapsulates coercive and enforced abortion.
In 2002 Secretary of State Colin Powell stated in a letter to Congress:
"Regrettably, the PRC has in place a regime of severe penalties on women who have unapproved births. This regime plainly operates to coerce pregnant women to have abortions in order to avoid the penalties and therefore amounts to a ‘program of coercive abortion.' Regardless of the modest size of UNFPA's budget in China or any benefits its programs provide, UNFPA's support of, and involvement in, China's population-planning activities allows the Chinese government to implement more effectively its program of coercive abortion.”
Yet The UNPFA seem to think this is a great thing
"China has had the most successful family planning policy in the history of mankind in terms of quantity and with that, China has done mankind a favour," United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) representative Sven Burmester said last week. —10/11/99 Agence France-Presse
Under the Regan Administration legislation sponsored by then- Rep. Jack Kemp (NY) and then-Sen. Bob Kasten (WI) ensured funding to the UNPFA was cut off for these very reasons. Yet is was no surprise when In 1993, the Clinton Administration dramatically revised the official interpretation of the “Kemp-Kasten amendment” in order to facilitate U.S. funding of UNFPA, thus making available $14.5 million.
In May 2003, the House Committee on International Relations narrowly adopted an an amendment by Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-NY) revoking the ban on such participation with the UNPFA. The amendment earmarked $100 million for UNFPA over the next two years.
The BBC today reports that China's top family planning body has warned of a "population rebound" as couples flout the one child policy rules:
In fact, last month, a survey by the National Population and Family Planning Commission found that the number of rich people and celebrities having more than one child was on a rapid increase, and nearly 10% of people in this category had three children.
More affluent people in China are refusing to go along with their masters' orders and would rather pay fines and have more than one child it seems.
There are countless other instances of depopulation programs, too numerous to go into in this brief article. We urge our readers to research them and expose them further.
Another pseudo-scientific fraud for social control
The doomsday warnings of the population bomb are complete pseudo-science. Populations in developed countries are declining and only in third world countries are they expanding dramatically.
Industrialization itself levels out population trends and even despite this world population models routinely show that the earth's population will level out at 9 billion in 2050 and slowly decline after that.
"The population of the most developed countries will remain virtually unchanged at 1.2 billion until 2050," states a United Nations report. The UN population policies seem to be in direct contradiction to THEIR OWN FINDINGS.
Conservation International's own study revealed that 46% of the earth's surface was an untouched wilderness, that is land areas not including sea. It is commonly accepted that the entire world population could all fit into the state of Texas and each have an acre of their own land.
Once a country industrializes there is an average of a 1.6 child rate per household, so the western world population is actually in decline. That trend has also been witnessed in areas of Asia like Japan and South Korea. The UN has stated that the population will peak at 9 billion and then begin declining.
The eco-extremists' comments along with Dr Pianka's ravings are merely echoes of the elite lust for a Malthusian social Darwinist control mechanism. Our global overlords wish to use the excuse of having to "save the earth" in order to take away freedom and implement a massive authoritarian control grid.
Now these people are using the out of control global warming hype to push their insane desire to cull the human population by 5.5 billion and silence anyone who speaks out against them.
We have already seen an overwhelming shift towards the implementation of a global carbon emissions tax , served up as a solution to combat global warming.
In reality the solution does not tackle the problem, it merely enforces control and restriction upon the lives of everyone on the planet.
If western governments were really concerned about climate change then they would be offering us incentives not punishments for reducing CO2 emissions in the form of tax breaks. But tax breaks aren't a giant cash bonanza for our exalted guardians of Mother Earth, the loving government, who are going to tax the living hell out of us for our own good and for the very survival of mankind, while lining their own pockets.
The masses are being indoctrinated in acceptance as they witness elite figures such as the Queen of England on a tour of the US which has been dubbed the "carbon-offset state visit", where a donation is made to an environmental charity to offset the plane journeys made by the royal party.
Here the royals are volunteering to pay a tax which does not even exist yet, in order to travel. People are being shown that this is the way forward and are being told that they are going to have to get used to huge financial burdens in order to curb carbon emissions while in reality the emissions stay uncurbed and other much more pressing environmental issues including industrial emissions of toxic pollutants such as mercury in the air, the dumping of chemical waste into the oceans and the manufacturing of GM crops containing live pesticides take a back seat.
In San Antonio this weekend Al Gore referred continually to a "new way of thinking" that is emerging in the country in the battle to control the effects global warming will have on the planet.
"It's in part a spiritual crisis," Gore told the crowd in the Convention Center at the American Institute of Architects national convention.
Indeed it is, the people are being coerced into a new form of religious worship. They are being told how they must think and what they must accept in order that their future be secure.
The 'enviro mental' movement has hijacked eco groups and activists alike and is pushing a green fraud to mask their agenda to mold a global neo feudalist society where a global body regulates and micro manages every aspect of our lives down to when we can and cannot move around and when we can and cannot reproduce.
