CITGO footage released - no plane

[KNOWTHIS]

This development raises more questions than answers for me. If you remember, the original excuse given for the withholding of nearby surveillance footage was the ongoing Zacarias Moussaoui trial. That would seem to suggest that the footage did indeed contain something relevant to the case. Now we find that after all this time they were holding video that really showed nothing at all? Why were they so reticent to release this video if it was of no particular value to the case? Judicial Watch for some reason is now speculating that this should put all questions and skepticism to rest but why? We still have no proof after all of these years that a Boeing hit the Pentagon. Don’t you think that if it did exist, with all of the controversy that has ensued, we would’ve seen it by now?

I guess there's also talk that nearby hotel footage will be released as well...finally. My guess is that will end up showing nothing as well. If there's nothing on it then there was no reason to withhold it for the trial or any other reason pertaining to national security in the first place as some have suggested. I smell a rabid rat.

link

Cameras Near Pentagon Missed 9/11 Attack, Group Says

During an "intense public debate," many people stated they believed the video -- which was taken from a CITGO station near the Pentagon -- would show American Airlines Flight 77 striking the complex on Sept. 11, 2001, Fitton stated.

"The CITGO tape evidently does not show the Pentagon attack," Fitton said, "which the American people can now see for themselves."

Now that the video footage has been released to the public, he added "there is no reason for further speculation about what it does or does not show."

[KNOWTHIS]

www.judicialwatch.org/

[KNOWTHIS]

www.prisonplanet.com/articles/September2006/150906_b_Video.htm

9/11 Gas Station Video Released - Does not show Flight 77

The long sought after and much hyped Citago gas station video from 9/11 has finally been released. See below for the video and the Raw Story report.

Remember that there are another 84 tapes that the FBI is withholding. The gas station had several security cameras aimed in the direction of the pentagon. Flight 77 flew directly over the gas station at an altitude of roughly 50 feet, less than 3 seconds from impact. If this is all the footage from the gas station then why was it retained under national security laws for five years?

The Doubletree hotel video apparently does not contain the impact either according to the FBI. This video is due to be released on or around November 9. There is a mystery surrounding the Sheraton hotel video though. The FBI says no such video exists, but According to a CNN FOIA request however, a nearby hotel's video DID capture the impact. There were also mainstream media reports that indicated that the staff from this hotel "sat and watched the video in horror" before it was confiscated by the FBI.

Is the government muddying the waters again with this latest release which has been hyped up for a long time now? This will once again whip up into a frenzy the no plane theories. If that happens and the next video, or perhaps the one after that, shows a clear impact of flight 77, then the alternative 9/11 theories that are gaining so much attention now will be widely and viciously attacked.

[chickenlittle]

Yes since when do they care about PEOPLES PRIVACY???I thought they threw all that out the window,
they can listen in on phone calss but they smeared the tape for the privacy of the individuals on it.
Give me a break,yes there are lies,upon lies, upon lies here,no doubt.
chicky

[KNOWTHIS]

Good point about the privacy chick. They only care about their own privacy which equates to secrecy.

[Mech]

They STILL wont release the rooftop cam footage of the hotels in the area.

Or the DOT highway cams nearby.

This speaks volumes to me.

How come it took the 5 YEARS to release this stuff?

Because they needed all that time to EDIT the video...most likely.

But remember....it IS an election year.

Ill bet October will be nothing but talk about....

terrrror...terrrror.....terrrror.

[thinkagain]

Maybe the purpose of "sequestering evidence" is neither to hide the truth nor influence the public. Maybe its purpose was to vete out how people, whom faced with conflciting evidence, will choose to believe. In other words, muddy up whatever clear evidence there might be, and you can find out the instinctive cognitive leanings of an individual. That provides valuable information with respect to whether or not they are on your side
This would explain why they would withhold any clear distinct evidence when it could have cleared up any questions in peoples mind.

A friend might say, I find nothing to stop me believing you are telling the truth....a foe might say, finding nothing means i believe you are lying ... an impartial observer might say, i can neither believe you are telling the truth or are lying, the evidence is not clear enough. It is a way for them to have us play our hand out, and commit emotionally, independent of what actually happenned... that is creating reality.

knowthis said:

We still have no proof after all of these years that a Boeing hit the Pentagon. Don’t you think that if it did exist, with all of the controversy that has ensued, we would’ve seen it by now?

I guess there's also talk that nearby hotel footage will be released as well...finally. My guess is that will end up showing nothing as well. If there's nothing on it then there was no reason to withhold it for the trial or any other reason pertaining to national security in the first place as some have suggested. I smell a rabid rat.