|
|
Post by increase 1776 on Jul 5, 2006 1:05:40 GMT -5
Moderating at a conspiracy forum is not always easy due to our subject matter including controversial topics such as politics, health and conspiracy, mixed sometimes with issues of anger and fear creating a complex dynamic. My goal is that the forums be a place where people of similar and differing opinions can discuss these topics in as positive an atmosphere as possible.
There is a publically acknowledged bias towards members who want to discuss Chemtrails, as opposed to those that want to debate, deny or deride Chemtrails simply because our history has proven that unreigned skeptics will create an unpleasant atmosphere that will drive other members away. Even if a skeptic is able to behave, eventually the sheer tedium of the repeated questions and challenges can lead to an intolerable environment. One problem that we recently suffered was when this bias was taken a bit too far, meaning that the forum was very safe from "intruders", but at the same time many who wanted to participate in open discussion of Chemtrails were either banned or blocked from the site.
So, my goal for the forum is just the right balance in these respects.
I'm pleased to announce that starman1 has agreed to help out around here and keep an eye on things by becoming a moderator. I think that they have been a helpful contributing member and I think that they understand the balance that I'm trying to reach as they were at one time unfairly removed from the forum during some tense times.
Thanks again, starman1.
We also plan to expand the team with more members soon, so if the goals I've stated seem reasonable, feel free to show your support and interest here and we'll keep it in mind.
At this moment, we are currently not accepting new member registrations so that we can establish the new moderation team and be more prepared for the next set of trolls, etc.
We greatly appreciate the support and participation of all our members as we try again to get things back into a better groove. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mech on Jul 5, 2006 1:42:22 GMT -5
EAT $#!+ THERMIT!
You are getting EXACTLY what you deserve.
What a jerk!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by increase 1776 on Jul 5, 2006 1:45:54 GMT -5
This is a profile from CTC. The members user name is mOp.So it looks like Thermit has made Cydoniaquest, a hacker,or Smell,the new moderator.Go figure.
Montana
Occupation: Goat Roper
Interests: Goats and Sheep starman1 Earth
Occupation: amatuer hacker
Interests: Electrocution/truth seeker Geronimo Partners sounds like a Bush front company.Prescott stole the Geronimo skull kept it .
|
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Jul 5, 2006 9:28:21 GMT -5
Did you say Mop is a mod now, Increase? WTF.
Mop is Smell/Cydoniaquest
starman1 was thrown off of Method of Destruction for being a debunker/spitter.
That is the official end of CTC
As if we needed to be reminded.
|
|
|
|
Post by increase 1776 on Jul 5, 2006 15:41:08 GMT -5
This is a copy of the profile for mOp. You decide...... starman1 and mOp came on immeadiately after the ctc board re-opened after the "Katrina Hack" and were throwing shit in our faces and laughing their asses off. If you still have copies of the mods section from CTC you can refresh yourself . Lives in Montana Occupation: Goat Roper
Interests: Goats and Sheep, starman1,Earth
Occupation: amatuer hacker
Interests: Electrocution/truth seeker Geronimo Partners sounds like a Bush front company.Prescott stole the Geronimo skull kept it .
|
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Jul 6, 2006 14:43:18 GMT -5
starman1 is someone else, and you know who it is.
Thermit has opened CTC to a Maverick's Boy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Jul 8, 2006 23:44:55 GMT -5
bump
|
|
|
|
Post by altitudelou on Jul 9, 2006 15:02:18 GMT -5
I recently posted a message to thermit at CTC wishing him well in cleaning up the place as well as good luck with the new mod team / whoever that will be, but it occurred to me that if the mod that are taking over at CTC are corrupt to begin with and serving their own agenda then obviously CTC is going to have a revolving door policy when it comes to Trolls and the Reynolds types of Debunkers, so WTF good will a new team of mods do for CTC if they themselves are trolls and debunkers?
That's like the Republicans forming an oversight committee to look into their own criminal behavior, what a joke and waste of time, seems to me if Thermit really wanted to put a good mod team back in charge at CTC he would want people that he already knows have a good track record at moderating, it's his business but that's my thoughts on it.
CTC can't get much worse than it is right now, it can only go up from here.
|
|
|
|
Post by et in Arcadia ego on Jul 9, 2006 23:14:38 GMT -5
That's hilarious..I fought for weeks to get rid of that asshole and now he's a friggin moderator..
Too Fucking Funny..
[hello, everyone, sorry I've been away]
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Jul 10, 2006 7:23:31 GMT -5
Glad you and the family are safe, and in more conducive surroundings.  It is too obvious that Thermit has let the goat-ropers loose in the "All-you-can-eat-steakhouse-for $7.95". Freakin' debunkers and Maverick's running CTC.  If this is not Bizarro World, I don't know what is. |
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Sept 8, 2006 3:30:36 GMT -5
I was trying to figure out Boomerchick. I figured because I was interested in something most of you already know about, that I should do my own homework. So I won't ramble on about it. I just want to say that I saw Mech the super moderator in action. Suggestion for Mods! Though I feel like I am now in the loop somewhat, a few things continue to make no sense at all. For one, she starts a thread asking the Mods to ban total skeptics, yet for some strange reason she supports Jay Reynolds at Arianna's place. There are probably a lot more questions I have, but to be honest, this is the big one to me. I also found it quite ironinc that she got banned on a thread she started about banning others. Then it leads one into those twisted Jay Reynolds' diversions. They both come across as being paid trolls. There is no other explanation that makes sense to me. She calls for the banning of Jay Reynold types, then she supports the guy. That makes no sense. And the way he attacks Lou, Halva, and countless others like Swampgas, Chem11...I thought when I first learned of the guy, I'd be reading long-winded, rightwing extrapolations on smog in the sky. I saw mostly just trolling from that guy. Maybe he got paid by the distraction. He is just like those loudmouth paid trolls on Huffington Post where this also no moderating going on. When you guys ran CTC even with Thermit holding you back, you wouldn't let dumbass trolls clog up the space without atleast a proper retort to the nonsense. Now it's like Starman? Why's he letting the ufologists and scaremongerers (religious freaks too)ramble on without at least an admonishment of their fantasy tabloid banter. |
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Sept 8, 2006 16:51:30 GMT -5
I can't seem to completely quit CTC. Today I just couldn't let a post from Mr. Jones stand without a response. I posted this at Chemtrails-GAO Report Admits 'Chaff'-Lab Report Reveals More. You Are No Expert on "chemtrails" Fri Sep 08, 2006 9:15 pm    quote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Originally posted by mr. jones The chemtrail movement (in my own "Jagged" opinion) has just about reasearched and investigated all the possible information that can humanly be possible to gather. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I would agree with you that a lot has been uncovered as regards to "chemtrails". The problem isn't that not enough has been uncovered to get this issue into the mainstream consciousness. The problem had been and continues to be all the disinformation and craziness that has been thrown into the forums making it too easy for nasty debunkers like Reynolds to keep pushing the idea that it is only water vapour up there, that such "contrails" have always been there since the early days of aviation, ships, factories, etc.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ quote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ And the conclusions are;population reduction at the top of the pyramid structure with lesser objectives below to help the sustain the structure and pecking order in place. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Those are your conclusions. If the old moderators were still here, you wouldn't be able to dominate this website so much with your conspiracy scare tactics. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ quote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The information gathering and analysis as it stands right now is mostly observation of (chemtrails) where and how much globally... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ If what you are on about was true, I would be 100% in your corner. However, there is much out there that you are simply ignoring in order to advance your view. For anyone stumbling here or for anyone getting frustrated with the direction this forum is heading, here is a website devoted to "chemtrails" which isn't "for entertainment purposes only". gastronamus.proboards27.com/index.cgi?board=aerosol I guess in your mind "geo-engineering" is a made up construct to divert attention away from the population culling going on. It seems that in your mind the ideas from Teller and Paul Crutzen don't even exist. |
|
|
|
Post by halva on Sept 10, 2006 0:17:54 GMT -5
I was trying to figure out Boomerchick. I figured because I was interested in something most of you already know about, that I should do my own homework. So I won't ramble on about it. I just want to say that I saw Mech the super moderator in action. Suggestion for Mods! Though I feel like I am now in the loop somewhat, a few things continue to make no sense at all. For one, she starts a thread asking the Mods to ban total skeptics, yet for some strange reason she supports Jay Reynolds at Arianna's place. There are probably a lot more questions I have, but to be honest, this is the big one to me. I also found it quite ironinc that she got banned on a thread she started about banning others. Then it leads one into those twisted Jay Reynolds' diversions. They both come across as being paid trolls. There is no other explanation that makes sense to me. She calls for the banning of Jay Reynold types, then she supports the guy. That makes no sense. I don't think BC is a paid troll. And not even Reynolds may have been paid for what he did (is he still doing it, somewhere, by the way?) I invited BC to Huffington's, as it then was, after she got thrown out of CTC. I judged that her particularly contradictory mentality would be useful for inserting contradiction into the debunker side also, and so - ultimately - it proved, because there is no doubt that she was a factor that made possible the (hopefully, hopefully) demoralization of Reynolds. |
|
|
|
Post by halva on Sept 10, 2006 0:29:09 GMT -5
Neither you nor I are keeping our word about dropping this subject, but I'd like to tell you that Reynolds turned up in my life when I got an article on chemtrails into the mainstream Greek press, an event which had consequences, because the
municipal council of Aigina then tried to take legal action against whoever was responsible for "chemtrails" (before being discouraged from continuing, for reasons as yet uninvestigated but perhaps to be investigated in future).
Is Reynolds still doing his thing, somewhere?
|
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Sept 10, 2006 12:34:37 GMT -5
Is Reynolds still doing his thing, somewhere? Back to the garlic and shallots, or posting about floor tiles.  I was trying to figure out Boomerchick.. Here's what she is up to now, since being laid off as Reynolds Groupie  |
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Sept 10, 2006 12:42:15 GMT -5
I don't think it's that we are talking about him too much. That guy was so in our faces and disrupting the chemtrail boards that ignoring him wasn't enough. He needed to be isolated and exposed. Now that he has been with the numerous threads on him showing how dishonest he is as regards to civility and debate, the need to discuss him has lessened greatly.
Have you noticed how quiet CTC has gotten? Even Debate Both Sides has gone down to next to nothing for chemtrail postings. This small site here with just over 60 members seems to have more value than a CTC with its thousands of people.
I have noticed that sometimes politicians have spoken up about the aerosol projects. We had Kucinich here. I have seen that people in Canada and Germany have spoken out. It is good to see that in Greece, where Democracy was started, some have tried to make a difference.
I think they went to nighttime spraying a while back because the daytime was too obvious. Yet, the overnights contribute to warming by trapping in the day's heat. Those behind the program are in a conundrum. If we have been right all these years, then the program is being conducted so fundamental economic structures do not need to be revamped. They are struggling to find a way to legitimize the program.
Debunkers have given them time to work out the kinks in the program. While internet readers have been boxed into fake debate, they have been scrambling to figure out a way to make it less obvious what is going on. Yet, the fundamental dilemma remains, which is how can such a program continue without awareness developing of the strange activities going on above?
I've noticed on forums that debunkers seem to show up on schedule with talking points ready to go. Yet, often they find themselves in situations where they have to go back to their bunkers and figure out how they are gonna frame their ideological spam.
I am starting to have an idea why the chemtrail forums are seeing less of the right wing angry let's annoy liberals types. I think that such an approach has worked for them in the past because they not only created an atmosphere that turned people away from investigating the situation, but they also were able to instigate rancor between honest people with differing political views.
Now that it is more difficult if not impossible to continue the facade of a gridlock society, such an approach hurts the credibility of the debunker. The BC type debunker is now more likely to be in the forefront of disinformation campaigns. Nothing right wingers say has any credibility right now. Yet if lefty posters make the comments, then readers will take their comments more seriously. This is why I think the large chemtrail forums are falling apart and Uncle Jay types are crawling back into their holes. The new strategy to me is one of ridiculing chemtrail observers while taking the politics out of it. Hence, one sees an increase in loony UFO postings with little discussion of more realistic theories as we all have tried to offer through "how to cool a planet" type threads. The new strategy has nothing to do with a contrail versus chemtrail approach. The new strategy is to hush realistic discussion while promoting the lunatic ones, like with 9/11 when websites were talking about holograms.
|
|
|
|
Post by halva on Sept 10, 2006 23:46:07 GMT -5
The left gatekeeper phenomenon, of which BC is a sui generis American example, is certainly a much more familiar obstacle in Europe than the Inhofe type politicians.
|
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Sept 11, 2006 9:23:31 GMT -5
Perhaps the 10 cup-a-day-of-coffee Horny Toad Boomerchick is in need of some extra cash? I do think using left-gatekeepers as disinformation purveyors is the correct path now for the Neo-Cons and Fascists, think Hillary. Sure, BoomBoom claims to dislike Bush, but the Aerosol Mitigation Project literally dwarfs even the Neo-Con agenda. The carrot approach if you will. The most hilarious debate with her was her angels/demons vs Dimethyltryptamine. She said visions of angels and demons are exactly that. They are entities. I said they are extensions of your own thoughts, amplified by the release of Dimethyltryptamine. She accused me of being a devil worshiper and a materialist. I was listening to a 9/11 debate on Democracy Now this morning between the Loose Change crew and the Popular Mechanics crew. Clearly, the Loose Change guys had their facts straight. The PM guys were always "Ask the Experts", or "You Conspiracy Theorists", etc. Finally the PM guy says, "We are good friends with liberal magazines like The Nation, and are all for getting to the bottom of this". This was to get the uncertain liberals on their side. "See, we are one of you". Rubbish!!!!! Even this guy was correct in his weird way........ "You'll find out that Boomerchick is not who she appears to be".....theseeker |
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Sept 15, 2006 15:00:39 GMT -5
Hey, it looks like the CTC Changes section is gone. Perhaps now.......... mission accomplished?  ?? This is why it is tough to see Halva, Chem11, and BigBunny going at it. Are myself and mmmmbarium going after each other? Our different outlooks are kind of a mirror image of the debate at megasprayer on barium or sulfur. Myself and Greenman had disagreements. Did we let it keep going? No we didn't. We all need to measure our words carefully when we are in disagreements. Like Swampgas said in another thread, debunkers love to see conflict among us and really loathe seeing us rationally discussing our differences. |
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 6, 2006 9:44:50 GMT -5
A website called orbwar.com has mirrored a deleted page from CTC that goes to the heart of that website's credibility. It is a two page thread. Page two is available where one can read the typical noise found at disinformation websites. Page one is much more revealing, and questions the integrity of that place along with the dude running the place. When you look at Testing Testing... take note of Thermit's ambiguous declaration of plausible deniability when it comes to his views on chemtrails and contrails. Also note how he never answers Trail Nix's rebuttal to his ramblings. There are also pointed references to Lulu and CTC's compromising of security. Yet, this page is deleted while the page two of noise remains in the archives. On a side note, Boomer Chick has declared that she is profoundly disappointed with DBS. What's his name didn't want anything to do with her because she believes in global warming. No one discussing chemtrails wanted anything to do with her because she backed up what's his name. With the appearance of multiple id posers there, she has decided to blast the integrity of DBS. Here is her emotional chastizing of DBS. Someone please get me a tissue. (sarcasm) I have no more desire to bicker with Halva. I think he is doing a fine job of late hammering what's his name at DBS and has even patched things up with Momp3. There is also a new chemtrail thread at Rigorous Intuition on chemtrails leaning toward a discussion of HAARP. Here is the link. Please note that these links disappear over time, they get moved somewhere else or something. So it might not be there when particular readers of this thread go there. No chemtrails without HAARP - You are now electro-sensitiveI point this one out because arcadia posted the following which pertains to this thread. He wrote, "Caveat emptor. Long story short, I'm a former moderator from that site and it's a Spook/Disinfo Candyland... Lots of speculations about chemtrails, and after hundreds of hours researching very difficult science material instead of merely indulging and bestowing faith towards the clusterfuck of paranoia sites out there who claim to know the 'truth', I like to consider myself a kinda/sorta authority on the subject and all I can really say is this: Most of what you read out there is bullshit, and those lies started from the begining by people with backgrounds so convoluted you can't begin to fathom it. Some of these individuals run from passive disinfo dessemination to extreme character assasination, tireless harrassment, instigating (successfully) child protective services against individuals, publishing personal details online, some extreme like details of sexual assaults, calling employers and causing persons to be fired, posting in forums so relentlessly and consistent you begin to wonder if they're even human and not some mutated form of Illuminati ChatBot..." Maybe I should just enjoy the sports on tv like a good brownshirt. It's just not my nature. |
|
|
|
Post by altitudelou on Oct 6, 2006 16:30:02 GMT -5
Socrates wrote,
"Most of what you read out there is bullshit, and those lies started from the begining by people with backgrounds so convoluted you can't begin to fathom it. Some of these individuals run from passive disinfo dessemination to extreme character assasination, tireless harrassment, instigating (successfully) child protective services against individuals, publishing personal details online, some extreme like details of sexual assaults, calling employers and causing persons to be fired, posting in forums so relentlessly and consistent you begin to wonder if they're even human and not some mutated form of Illuminati ChatBot..."
Maybe I should just enjoy the sports on tv like a good brownshirt.
It's just not my nature."
__________________________________________________
( Read between the lines )
Socrates,
Indeed, I agree 100% with your thoughts on most of the stuff you read out there being bullshit, as a matter of fact, recently, I reached a point at which I had all the bullshit that I in my own frustration could take and lashed out at someone who has been a crusader for finding the truth of this Chemtrail / Global Spraying issue.
This person has been an invaluable member of the pro-Chemtrail family of activist and I should have been more sensitive to the reasons for their strange post, I'm still trying to work that misunderstanding on my part out privately and not publicly in order to keep the peace, sometimes things just get convoluted and twisted because of the very things that you have listed above and a person may write something that seems uncharacteristic of them but they are almost automatically chastised for it and branded a traitor to the cause when on a second look they are in fact guiltless of any offense, real or imagined and deserve better treatment, at the least given the benefit of the doubt.
It is those and the behavior that you mention above that are responsible for this "Rush to judgment" attitude by us of others, even our own who offer a different opinion now and then, it is the debunker types at every level that have instilled in us a certain amount of distrust that is triggered automatically when we read something that seems a bit unusual or new to our thinking of a particular subject, I think this manipulation and conditioning of sorts by the debunkers is what they really want to achieve, to drive a wedge of division between like thinking people such as us so that we become alienated from each other and divided on the issues. ( sorry if this sounds like a Republican political strategy but in a way, isn't it? )
For the reasons that you list above I pulled back from becoming embroiled in what was becoming a bitter pissing contest between friends initially created by outside instigators based on not what I was reading here at Gastro but at other forums, I realized that I had been drawn into attacking a friend for the same reasons that I have been attacking the instigators and debunkers for so long, I let this happen when I should have thought for a moment and defended our friend and to my friend, I would like to say, I'm sorry.
I decided that kind of thing isn't going to be happening again, period, I have decided that I can not afford to listen to anything that the opposition has to say, for the sake of my own mental health I am on a strict diet of NO DEBUNKERS, NO INSTAGATORS and no more dealing with them or their ilk, they are a waste of my time which can better serve our cause of finding out the truth behind the spraying of our sky's and the criminals responsible for it.
My focus had strayed for a time but no more, my goal is once again focused solely on the spraying issue and not those who debunk, misinform and drive wedges.
|
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 7, 2006 10:18:32 GMT -5
posted by Lou:
"Socrates,
Indeed, I agree 100% with your thoughts on most of the stuff you read out there being bullshit, as a matter of fact, recently, I reached a point at which I had all the bullshit that I in my own frustration could take and lashed out at someone who has been a crusader for finding the truth of this Chemtrail / Global Spraying issue."
Hi Lou, just to clarify, et in Arcadia ego wrote everything in your quoting just above except for my "Maybe I should just enjoy the sports on tv like a good brownshirt."
posted by Lou:
"This person has been an invaluable member of the pro-Chemtrail family of activist and I should have been more sensitive to the reasons for their strange post, I'm still trying to work that misunderstanding on my part out privately and not publicly in order to keep the peace, sometimes things just get convoluted and twisted because of the very things that you have listed above and a person may write something that seems uncharacteristic of them but they are almost automatically chastised for it and branded a traitor to the cause when on a second look they are in fact guiltless of any offense, real or imagined and deserve better treatment, at the least given the benefit of the doubt."
Yes, I agree, I am trying to give Halva the benefit of the doubt more or at the least co-exist, and when there is a disagreement I will try to find ways to counterpoint without coming across as a divisive jackass.
posted by Lou:
"It is those and the behavior that you mention above that are responsible for this "Rush to judgment" attitude by us of others, even our own who offer a different opinion now and then, it is the debunker types at every level that have instilled in us a certain amount of distrust that is triggered automatically when we read something that seems a bit unusual or new to our thinking of a particular subject, I think this manipulation and conditioning of sorts by the debunkers is what they really want to achieve, to drive a wedge of division between like thinking people such as us so that we become alienated from each other and divided on the issues. ( sorry if this sounds like a Republican political strategy but in a way, isn't it? )"
I agree with this assessment. It is basic trolling 101 that when a viewpoint or topic can't possibly be debunked, the last resort is to create noise, confusion, and post anything that will get the focus off topic.
posted by Lou:
"For the reasons that you list above I pulled back from becoming embroiled in what was becoming a bitter pissing contest between friends initially created by outside instigators based on not what I was reading here at Gastro but at other forums, I realized that I had been drawn into attacking a friend for the same reasons that I have been attacking the instigators and debunkers for so long, I let this happen when I should have thought for a moment and defended our friend and to my friend, I would like to say, I'm sorry."
If you are referring to the Mom_p_3 thread, then yes, we perhaps went over the top in nailing Halva. We should have just made our points calmly and then waited for his response.
As regards to my past frustration with Halva, there is no need to continue on about it. One can go to Megasprayer to figure that one out.
posted by Lou:
"I decided that kind of thing isn't going to be happening again, period, I have decided that I can not afford to listen to anything that the opposition has to say, for the sake of my own mental health I am on a strict diet of NO DEBUNKERS, NO INSTIGATORS and no more dealing with them or their ilk, they are a waste of my time which can better serve our cause of finding out the truth behind the spraying of our sky's and the criminals responsible for it.
My focus had strayed for a time but no more, my goal is once again focused solely on the spraying issue and not those who debunk, misinform and drive wedges."
The time for confronting debunkers is long past. Perhaps in 1999-2001, this was the time to nail them for their nasty mind games. The big problem now for chemtrail awareness is the ongoing saturation of the internet with crazy ideas. The ones who say it's just water vapour, that it's always been like that, or that there is more air traffic now, they are finished. Unfortunately, there are still too many loony tunes being offered by so-called pro-chemtrail websites.
"They" don't want us making too much sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by altitudelou on Oct 7, 2006 20:06:52 GMT -5
Socrates, wrote,
"Hi Lou, just to clarify, et in Arcadia ego wrote everything in your quoting just above except for my "Maybe I should just enjoy the sports on tv like a good brownshirt."
__________________________________________________
Ah, ET, where is he, I miss his post, very intelligent he is.
I don't have much to say on this one, said it all in my prior post and I don't want to drift back into the whole, you know who debunker thing, nothing productive there at all, he has his home and I mine, that's just fine with me, at least if I choose I can go to other forums without fearing being banned instantly when they hear my name, unlike, you know who.
Halva has not been here in awhile, I wonder what's up with him, I know he isn't angry with me for my post, we had a basic American / Greek misunderstanding of which it was more my fault no doubt, anyway, I covered that in my prior post, I just hope that Halva is doing Ok.
Right, I'm back out for now, take care.
|
|
|
|
Post by greenman on Oct 8, 2006 9:10:48 GMT -5
A website called orbwar.com has mirrored a deleted page from CTC that goes to the heart of that website's credibility. It is a two page thread. Page two is available where one can read the typical noise found at disinformation websites. Page one is much more revealing, and questions the integrity of that place along with the dude running the place. When you look at Testing Testing... take note of Thermit's ambiguous declaration of plausible deniability when it comes to his views on chemtrails and contrails. Also note how he never answers Trail Nix's rebuttal to his ramblings. There are also pointed references to Lulu and CTC's compromising of security. Yet, this page is deleted while the page two of noise remains in the archives. The thread is still at CTC . Maybe Orbwars.com has problems of its own www.chemtrailcentral.com/forum/thread2891.html |
|
|
|
Post by socrates on Oct 8, 2006 13:29:06 GMT -5
Could be. From reading what you found, the thread was moved into the freeform section. Maybe that explains this. Maybe because Orbwars mirrored the page, CTC had to put it back up. I don't know. There was another one Orbwars put up for censorship on the subliminal chemtrails. It is also strange that the new moderator Starman was someone it looks like got banned but was allowed back in, and now he is the moderator. Any idea on the orbwars thing swampgas or others who were also at CTC then? |
|
|
|
Post by Swamp Gas on Oct 8, 2006 13:39:19 GMT -5
Oh, THAT Thread.
Lulu the Server of IPs to Maverick's
I forgot, Billy Joe McAllister and Feeling Kocky were also Cydoniaquest/Jason.
Someone unnaamed said that Jason had at least 50 alias on CTC.
HiTech was a pretty decent person, and Lulu was always attacking him.
Someone even said that Lulu was Jason because a Proxy Slip up gave the same company in Canada one time between Whitemajikman/Jason and Lulu. Maybe......or they used the same proxy in Canada.
I am just glad to be out of that Den of Deceit, and never even bother with Maverick's, except for an occasional joke. Funny, how 75% of the posters at Maverick's are the same person.
|
|
